Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 04-19-2006, 07:44 PM
EvilSmurf EvilSmurf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 206
Default Re: Why aren\'t setup men paid better?

It seems to me often pitchers who throw 1 or 2 different pitches, but throw them really, really, well who become closers/relievers. Does the evidence point to that?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-19-2006, 08:02 PM
tdarko tdarko is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Watching Channel 9
Posts: 8,058
Default Re: Why aren\'t setup men paid better?

ES,

The evidence leads to the guys that can throw only two pitches exceptionally well tend to have a hard time as starters, of course, like in anything there is exceptions but starters need to have three pitches. A starter could get by for 3-4 innings with 2 dominating pitches but the problem is that he is going to box himself in a corner without a 3rd pitch the more times he gets through the lineup. Relievers can get by with two pitches b/c they are seeing batters once, but of course there are relievers/closers with 3 plus pitches as well.

As a hitter its hard to center a guy like Lidge with an explosive fastball and great slider if you only get one at-bat, but if you get 4, Lidge is going to have to learn a Change/Split, instead of throwing everything hard, when everything is coming at you hard and the difference in speed isn't at 3 levels sometimes this can be a bad thing for pitchers. For instance, if a pitcher throws a fastball at a range of 95-97 and a slider at 87-88, the difference in speed isn't that great but the pitches may be dominant at first. Once the hitters get the timing, say the 4th inning, is when a change up around 79-81 would completely muck them up. Starters usually need 3 different levels of velocity. May not be a good example b/c I am not sure if he has more than 2 pitches, he may have a chang-up?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-19-2006, 09:07 PM
mblax10 mblax10 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,064
Default Re: Why aren\'t setup men paid better?

[ QUOTE ]
If anyone is interested in this, there is a very thorough chapter in The Book about how best to leverage your relievers in order to get the most wins, not saves.

[/ QUOTE ]

There's also a very good chapter in "Basbeall Betwenn the Numbers" regarding how to most effectivley use your closer. It discusses leverage too. Basically if the situations (run differential/bases occupied/outs) are the same, an out later in the game is more valuable because it increases your chances of victory much more.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-19-2006, 09:18 PM
Jack of Arcades Jack of Arcades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 13,859
Default Re: Why aren\'t setup men paid better?

Lidge throws just the slider and the fastball. Still, his slider's pretty unhittible (unless your Albert Pujols).

Mo is another 2 pitch guy (Cutter) and BJ Ryan (Slider). When Smoltz was a closer he mostly used his splitter and fastball.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-19-2006, 10:08 PM
ChuckyB ChuckyB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Fox Soccer Report
Posts: 2,470
Default Re: Why aren\'t setup men paid better?

"Why aren't setup men paid better?"

It's kind of like asking why utility men aren't paid better...after all, they can play four positions.

If a setup man has the cajones to become a closer, they will get paid better.

Closers put out fires. That's what they're there for. However too many managers are so bean-headed that they allow the save statistic to dictate how they use their pitchers. "Let's see, we're up 3 in the 9th, there's a man on first and two out...better get Hoffman in there."

If more managers were willing to defy convention and use their "closer" at the pivotal point in the game (perhaps they're in real danger in the 7th) we'd understand why closers are paid more.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04-19-2006, 10:10 PM
Jack of Arcades Jack of Arcades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 13,859
Default Re: Why aren\'t setup men paid better?

[ QUOTE ]
If a setup man has the cajones to become a closer, they will get paid better.

[/ QUOTE ]

It's not a matter of "cajones," it's a matter of opportunity. Many players have gone from setup men to closer, or starter to closer without a hitch.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04-19-2006, 10:12 PM
Wynton Wynton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: coping with the apokerlypse
Posts: 5,123
Default Re: Why aren\'t setup men paid better?

[ QUOTE ]

Closers put out fires.

[/ QUOTE ]

But this is my main point: closers today hardly ever put out fires. Rather, it is more often the setup guys who put out the fires. And I think that the guy who comes into the 7th or 8th inning with one out and a man in scoring position is doing something more valuable than the guy who just happens to pitch the ninth without anyone on base.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 04-19-2006, 10:17 PM
ChuckyB ChuckyB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Fox Soccer Report
Posts: 2,470
Default Re: Why aren\'t setup men paid better?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Closers put out fires.

[/ QUOTE ]

But this is my main point: closers today hardly ever put out fires. Rather, it is more often the setup guys who put out the fires.

[/ QUOTE ]

I totally agree. And that's done by managers who are afraid to defy convention for a move that just makes sense.

Didn't John Gibbons bring in B.J. Ryan in the 7th to get the Jays out of trouble recently?
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 04-19-2006, 10:19 PM
ChuckyB ChuckyB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Fox Soccer Report
Posts: 2,470
Default Re: Why aren\'t setup men paid better?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If a setup man has the cajones to become a closer, they will get paid better.

[/ QUOTE ]

It's not a matter of "cajones," it's a matter of opportunity. Many players have gone from setup men to closer, or starter to closer without a hitch.

[/ QUOTE ]

And a for every Duane Ward there's an Octavio Dotel, Tim Worrell, Robert Person, Jeremy Affeldt and a Shawn Chacon.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 04-19-2006, 10:28 PM
Jack of Arcades Jack of Arcades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 13,859
Default Re: Why aren\'t setup men paid better?

lol. Shawn Chacon had 35 saves with a 7.11 ERA. I think that kinda disproves your point, no?

Octavio Dotel was pitching pretty much without an arm.

Tim Worrell? 38 saves at 35, with a sub-3 ERA. He has 6 saves this year.

For all those guys you mentioned...

Gagne
Mo
Lidge
Dempster
Isringhausen
Todd Jones
Danys Baez
Joe Nathan
Chad Cordero
Miguel Batista
Eddie Guardado

And that's just last year.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.