Notorious online cheat caught colluding in WSOP PLO?

[Fermion5]

[ QUOTE ]
Advanced slow playing technique -- a lot of you more noobish posters wont understand, but it's much more deceptive than checking OOP. Also great for meta game, because the next time you check behind on the river they may just muck their hand, assuming you have the nuts again.

[/ QUOTE ]

awesome.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Backstory to "notorious online cheat"?

[/ QUOTE ]

rumors have swirled for awhile that striker 10 might cheat in the big o8 games on ps

[/ QUOTE ]

That's not a rumor, and one of his accounts was locked from Party for cheating the 1k single tables.

Zeejustin is a Chior Boy compared to him. Ironically ZeeJustin knew the extent of his cheating in party sitngoes and complained.

Cheating is bad enough, but he's done a lot worse to people than just cheat online poker.

I also received reliable information that Farnood in fact had 10% of Persson from an earlier swap at the table. There is no doubt this was collusion. I just wonder whether the details as they played out are in fact true.

[/ QUOTE ]

So for an example when he is playing three handed with Gus and Benyamine like he has done recently, how does he cheat?

[RioGossiper]

[ QUOTE ]


So for an example when he is playing three handed with Gus and Benyamine like he has done recently, how does he cheat?

[/ QUOTE ]

Well for one, he lends his account and it might not be him playing. Not sure if that's outright cheating though. It probably was him playing if it was 1-2 o8.

He made all of the money he had from scamming people. He can't win longterm without cheating. It is a good thing he is talented at it. He's certainly a superstar in his own realm of scamming.

[bwana devil]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Wait, why should the short stack be DQ'd? Cause someone checked the nuts behind him? This is pathetic if the short stack gets DQ'd for someone else's play who has 10% of him.

[/ QUOTE ]
???? Because they are both cheating? DUCY?



[/ QUOTE ]

no, i dont see why. please explain.

the actions benefit the short stack but that doesnt mean the short stack had anything to do w/ it.

so if i wanted to DQ ivey from the WSOP, i could check the nuts against him and he'd be out? brilliant.

[Enervate]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Tony G wants him to have a longer penalty.

[/ QUOTE ]

I always love seeing this guy complain about something. If anyone sees him ask him about the $100 he owes me.

[/ QUOTE ]

What?

[mikechops]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Wait, why should the short stack be DQ'd? Cause someone checked the nuts behind him? This is pathetic if the short stack gets DQ'd for someone else's play who has 10% of him.

[/ QUOTE ]
???? Because they are both cheating? DUCY?



[/ QUOTE ]

no, i dont see why. please explain.

the actions benefit the short stack but that doesnt mean the short stack had anything to do w/ it.

so if i wanted to DQ ivey from the WSOP, i could check the nuts against him and he'd be out? brilliant.

[/ QUOTE ]

This isn't a criminal trial where we need proof beyond a reasonable doubt. If the shortstack is indeed innocent then he is paying a price for being staked by a dubious individual.

[towery]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Wait, why should the short stack be DQ'd? Cause someone checked the nuts behind him? This is pathetic if the short stack gets DQ'd for someone else's play who has 10% of him.

[/ QUOTE ]
???? Because they are both cheating? DUCY?



[/ QUOTE ]

no, i dont see why. please explain.

the actions benefit the short stack but that doesnt mean the short stack had anything to do w/ it.

so if i wanted to DQ ivey from the WSOP, i could check the nuts against him and he'd be out? brilliant.

[/ QUOTE ]

This isn't a criminal trial where we need proof beyond a reasonable doubt. If the shortstack is indeed innocent then he is paying a price for being staked by a dubious individual.

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe you don't need proof beyond reasonable doubt, but I am pretty sure every tournament director in the world disagrees with you.

[RioGossiper]

[ QUOTE ]


Maybe you don't need proof beyond reasonable doubt, but I am pretty sure every tournament director in the world disagrees with you.

[/ QUOTE ]

O RLY? Thomas Kremser has said he would have disqualified them both possibly, and at least two round penalty.

[stinkypete]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Persson has one chip.~~~


[/ QUOTE ]

obvious collusion. the unfortunate thing is its kinda hard to do anything about it.

[/ QUOTE ]

How so? Disqualifying both is the correct solution.

[/ QUOTE ]

good luck making that happen

[stinkypete]

[ QUOTE ]
i heard gus hansen at the main event this year say that if you are last to act and check the nuts it is an automatic penalty.

[/ QUOTE ]

this rule was in fact in effect.