Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 09-06-2007, 01:04 PM
kylephilly kylephilly is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: illadelph
Posts: 2,019
Default Re: 50NL; AA vs. known 2+2\'er

I lead flop, turn, cc river, he isn't folding KQ or AQ, looks like he caught up to you on the river. Two C/C's gives you no information.

As played definitely check shove turn.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-06-2007, 01:17 PM
GtrHtr GtrHtr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,729
Default Re: 50NL; AA vs. known 2+2\'er

[ QUOTE ]
GtrHtr, that's fine. But if I bet or check/raise flop what do we expect to happen? I expect he folds everything except sets (I don't think AQ or the like is in his range). I took this line specifically because of the fact that he can 2 and 3 barrel me. I saw it as the only way to really get value from a worse hand than mine. You disagree I guess???


BTW what is "ffs".

[/ QUOTE ]

The reason you want to bet the flop is for value. In a rr'ed pot with a call pf, you will get a lot of value from AA oop by betting and getting worse hands to come along. Don't worry if they fold. If they fold to your flop bet or flop c/r then you got the most value out of your hand you were going to get.

So put him on a range, lets say he calls your 3 bet with TT+, AQs+. The only hand you are behind in that range is QQ on the flop. AQ will and AK may come along, AK thinking he still has 2 overs and AQ has flopped TPTK. TT is less likely but may call one street if you bet out, but fold to a c/r. JJ will likely still call but fold to a c/r. Both those hands you will get value only on the flop so betting or c/r doesn't really matter that much. QQ you're smoked, and KK will call or rr you the whole way if you lead or c/r.

Analyze all that info and determine your best line.

I'll leave the subject of slowplaying, which is what you did, to someone else but I will rarely slowplay at 100nl or 50nl simply because bad players will call with weaker hands all day long. This villain isn't a weak player on avg, but I wouldn't adjust my line regardless.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-06-2007, 04:49 PM
Lego05 Lego05 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,477
Default Re: 50NL; AA vs. known 2+2\'er

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
GtrHtr, that's fine. But if I bet or check/raise flop what do we expect to happen? I expect he folds everything except sets (I don't think AQ or the like is in his range). I took this line specifically because of the fact that he can 2 and 3 barrel me. I saw it as the only way to really get value from a worse hand than mine. You disagree I guess???


BTW what is "ffs".

[/ QUOTE ]

The reason you want to bet the flop is for value. In a rr'ed pot with a call pf, you will get a lot of value from AA oop by betting and getting worse hands to come along. Don't worry if they fold. If they fold to your flop bet or flop c/r then you got the most value out of your hand you were going to get.

So put him on a range, lets say he calls your 3 bet with TT+, AQs+. The only hand you are behind in that range is QQ on the flop. AQ will and AK may come along, AK thinking he still has 2 overs and AQ has flopped TPTK. TT is less likely but may call one street if you bet out, but fold to a c/r. JJ will likely still call but fold to a c/r. Both those hands you will get value only on the flop so betting or c/r doesn't really matter that much. QQ you're smoked, and KK will call or rr you the whole way if you lead or c/r.

Analyze all that info and determine your best line.

I'll leave the subject of slowplaying, which is what you did, to someone else but I will rarely slowplay at 100nl or 50nl simply because bad players will call with weaker hands all day long. This villain isn't a weak player on avg, but I wouldn't adjust my line regardless.

[/ QUOTE ]


All of your analysis is off based on the fact that this is not a 3bet pot. I raised in the sb and he called in the bb. Your mistake here now clears up and makes sense of the fact that you thought it important to say that he only has QQ here like 25% of the time. Reread the hand please. He of course has QQ here 0% of the time.

I certainly would have bet in a 3bet pot.

Here however, instead of a range of like TT-AA,AK I feel he has a range more like 22-88 and if I bet he'll mostly fold the ones that didn't make a set and call or raise with the ones that did. (He may float me with some missed sets and then would most likely fold to a turn bet if the turn doesn't set him.)
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 09-06-2007, 04:58 PM
Lego05 Lego05 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,477
Default Re: 50NL; AA vs. known 2+2\'er

[ QUOTE ]
I lead flop, turn, cc river, he isn't folding KQ or AQ, looks like he caught up to you on the river. Two C/C's gives you no information.

As played definitely check shove turn.

[/ QUOTE ]

He doesn't have KQ or AQ. I can be 98% sure that these hands are not in his pre-flop calling range.



I really feel like 90%+ of his range is 22-88 with most of the rest maybe being some suited connector or mayybe 99. Do people disagree with this or do they disagree with how I played the hand based upon that assumption?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 09-06-2007, 05:04 PM
huhwhatyousay? huhwhatyousay? is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NYU
Posts: 220
Default Re: 50NL; AA vs. known 2+2\'er

Bet flop, bet turn, check/call river. You've grossly underrepresented your hand up to this point, so I can't find the fold button. I think you are good >= 33% of the time here.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 09-06-2007, 05:08 PM
squashington squashington is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 102
Default Re: 50NL; AA vs. known 2+2\'er

Almost positive said villain has 44 or 55 here. Twice I've seen him take a very similar line w/ a set. He likes to overbet shove the river with these hands. Plus his turn line looks like he wants to build a big pot, something KQ/AQ probably isn't looking to do.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 09-06-2007, 05:38 PM
GtrHtr GtrHtr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,729
Default Re: 50NL; AA vs. known 2+2\'er

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
GtrHtr, that's fine. But if I bet or check/raise flop what do we expect to happen? I expect he folds everything except sets (I don't think AQ or the like is in his range). I took this line specifically because of the fact that he can 2 and 3 barrel me. I saw it as the only way to really get value from a worse hand than mine. You disagree I guess???


BTW what is "ffs".

[/ QUOTE ]

The reason you want to bet the flop is for value. In a rr'ed pot with a call pf, you will get a lot of value from AA oop by betting and getting worse hands to come along. Don't worry if they fold. If they fold to your flop bet or flop c/r then you got the most value out of your hand you were going to get.

So put him on a range, lets say he calls your 3 bet with TT+, AQs+. The only hand you are behind in that range is QQ on the flop. AQ will and AK may come along, AK thinking he still has 2 overs and AQ has flopped TPTK. TT is less likely but may call one street if you bet out, but fold to a c/r. JJ will likely still call but fold to a c/r. Both those hands you will get value only on the flop so betting or c/r doesn't really matter that much. QQ you're smoked, and KK will call or rr you the whole way if you lead or c/r.

Analyze all that info and determine your best line.

I'll leave the subject of slowplaying, which is what you did, to someone else but I will rarely slowplay at 100nl or 50nl simply because bad players will call with weaker hands all day long. This villain isn't a weak player on avg, but I wouldn't adjust my line regardless.

[/ QUOTE ]


All of your analysis is off based on the fact that this is not a 3bet pot. I raised in the sb and he called in the bb. Your mistake here now clears up and makes sense of the fact that you thought it important to say that he only has QQ here like 25% of the time. Reread the hand please. He of course has QQ here 0% of the time.

I certainly would have bet in a 3bet pot.

Here however, instead of a range of like TT-AA,AK I feel he has a range more like 22-88 and if I bet he'll mostly fold the ones that didn't make a set and call or raise with the ones that did. (He may float me with some missed sets and then would most likely fold to a turn bet if the turn doesn't set him.)

[/ QUOTE ]

You're absolutely correct. Thanks for the pm as well.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 09-06-2007, 05:47 PM
ama0330 ama0330 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Crushing
Posts: 5,704
Default Re: 50NL; AA vs. known 2+2\'er

IDK why you dont want to lead with your aggressive image. The way you have played the hand you have to call
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 09-06-2007, 05:50 PM
Waingro Waingro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,274
Default Re: 50NL; AA vs. known 2+2\'er

I think this a very reasonable line. Our goal is to maximize EV and against an aggressive opponet c/c three streets is the way to go and since the money went in by the river, there is absolutely no way a raise anywhere is needed. You bet and raise with AA to get the money in the middle, but the money went in anyway. I just donīt understand why people say raise when all the money went in.

Ok now what does he have? Much of your reasoning seems to be that he would play a hand with showdown value like 77 and try to bluff you off what looks to him like TT or something. I just donīt see that happening that often unless you have some serious history. Since you donīt think he can have top pair and overplay it I think it is a fairly trivial fold. I mean, if have seen him shove river just once as a bluff I think I could be swayed. I can see him take two stabs but the river is a fold.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 09-06-2007, 05:53 PM
Lego05 Lego05 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,477
Default Re: 50NL; AA vs. known 2+2\'er

I might repost this hand and try to be more clear and provide more info in the first post.

I really wanted to deal with his range and what he does with it after I act. I see people in here talking about AQ, KQ and he like never has those hands once pre-flop is over.


Then as for check raising flop and turn I think it's pretty bad. Let's see:

Flop: Ok the vast majority of his range is probably 22-88 (disagree with the assumption if you want but point that out and.) If I checkraise he calls or pushes with 444/555 and folds 22/33/66/77/88. So I just minimized wins and maximized losses. So I tried to play flop how I played it. Moving on:

Turn: Ok now if I checkraise he calls with 444/555/888 and folds 22/33/66/77. So again I minimized wins and maximized losses. So again I tried it how I played it.

River: Now I just wasn't sure if he'd 3barrel especially by shoving with 22/33/66/77 or if it had to be 444/555/888 at this point.


If you are going to talk to me talk to me in terms of his range (And state what you are assuming it to be or else it's pointless) and how I can maximize my value against it. I'm going to try to never bet or raise for info. And betting or raising for info in this hand is particularly silly IMO because it completely turns my hand into a bluff and I don't like turning AA into a bluff.




Here's a convo I just had with my friend about this hand. He's mostly a tournament player, but he plays cash games sometimes. He does quite well: banked significantly over $100,000 last year and had a WCOOP final table. I think this is a real good discussion about this hand:



FRIEND (5:09:30 PM): hmm
FRIEND (5:09:44 PM): is flop check standard?
ME (5:09:51 PM): no
ME (5:10:09 PM): what range of hands would u figure for him after he calls pre-flop though
ME (5:10:23 PM): btw in the last 10 of 15 min. at this table i had 4bet him twice
ME (5:10:32 PM): pre-flop 4 bet i mean
FRIEND (5:11:00 PM): well do those numbers mean, is he loose or tight pre?
FRIEND (5:11:28 PM): i guess a lot of pocket pairs
Mambreno (5:11:28 PM): well here he puts money in the pot 17.5% of the time. 13.5% of the time he does it by raising
FRIEND (5:12:08 PM): do u think he is calling AQ/KQ out of BB?
ME (5:12:21 PM): no
ME(5:12:47 PM): i put the vast majority of his range to be something like 22-88
FRIEND (5:12:53 PM): yeah
FRIEND (5:13:06 PM): u think he is ever calling suited connectors?
FRIEND (5:13:46 PM): could 67 be in his range?
ME(5:16:03 PM): possible; i think nearly all of his range is 22-88, with perhaps some suited connectors, and maayyybe 99, I've 4bet him twice so maybe give like a .1% chance to something like AQ but I doubt that

He's a good player so it's like gotta be pairs and maybe connectors and i'm raising from the sb so he's gotta know i almost definitely have something but connectors need to have a higher return and i' not entirely sure what he'd do with a connector but i think it's significantly less likely he'd call witht that than with a pair
FRIEND (5:16:44 PM): gotcha
FRIEND (5:16:59 PM): do u ever slowplay QQ on this board?
FRIEND (5:17:25 PM): im just havin trouble putting him on anything other than a set
FRIEND (5:17:42 PM): and ur hand looks a lot like what it is
ME (5:18:21 PM): ah i might check QQ once on either flop or turn but that's probably it
FRIEND (5:18:36 PM): yeah
FRIEND (5:18:47 PM): i dont see how he puts u on anything put AA
FRIEND (5:18:56 PM): do u think he expects you to fold AA on the river
ME (5:19:40 PM): i think its very rare at 50nl for someone to try to get another person off an overpair even when both players in question are pretty good and both know it
ME (5:19:50 PM): especially on a dry board like this
FRIEND (5:20:01 PM): yeah thats what i think too
Auto response from Mambreno (5:20:01 PM): I am away from my computer right now.

ME (5:20:28 PM): u don't think my hand could like like AQ/JJ?
FRIEND (5:20:42 PM): AQ maybe
FRIEND (5:20:53 PM): i dont think u check call two streets with JJ
FRIEND(5:21:48 PM): i think i fold
FRIEND(5:22:02 PM): there arent many semibluffing hands he could have
FRIEND (5:22:15 PM): i think its either a set or air
Mambreno (5:22:25 PM): what do u think about the line i took in general?
FRIEND (5:22:36 PM): i think the whole hand plays easier if u bet flop
ME (5:22:47 PM): yea it def. plays easier
rementcnj (5:22:54 PM): especially since ur prob cbetting a lot of hands that missed
ME (5:23:24 PM): it def. plays easier but do u think betting the flop is better value wise
FRIEND (5:25:47 PM): hmm
FRIEND (5:26:09 PM): maybe not
FRIEND (5:26:15 PM): i guess flop check is ok
FRIEND (5:26:21 PM): such a dry board
FRIEND (5:26:47 PM): and not many hands can call a flop bet from u
FRIEND (5:26:55 PM): that u beat that is
FRIEND (5:27:00 PM): maybe AQ
FRIEND (5:27:09 PM): everything else will prob just fold
ME (5:27:31 PM): thatwas my thinking
ME (5:28:42 PM): it's the same on the turn IMO though
FRIEND (5:29:07 PM): yeah
FRIEND (5:29:28 PM): yeah i think u played it fine
FRIEND (5:29:38 PM): river is a fold imo
FRIEND (5:29:53 PM): ur whole line looks like AA trying to induce bluff/pot control
ME (5:29:54 PM): yea i wasn't sure if he'd 3barrel especially with a shoce without a set
FRIEND (5:30:01 PM): and i dont think he expects u to fold AA on river
ME (5:30:02 PM): *shove
FRIEND (5:30:30 PM): yeah without too much of a history i dont think he is 3 barrelling often enough to call
ME (5:30:41 PM): ok, thanks
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.