|
|
#21
08-20-2007, 06:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Nevada and California Rules regarding Table Change buy ins
[ QUOTE ]
Players moving to a game of the same limit, on a voluntary basis are required to keep the same stack and are not allowed to cash out. Player's from a forced move situation, such as a broken game, can enter for less than the minimum buy in, provided thats all the chips they had when the game broke. [/ QUOTE ] Not in LA. 
|
|
#22
08-21-2007, 03:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Nevada and California Rules regarding Table Change buy ins
Interesting to note that Robert's Rules... widely regarded as the most complete/universal set of poker room guidelines, doesn't cover this topic in any way, shape or form.
|
|
#23
08-21-2007, 09:24 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
had to fix my post!
[ QUOTE ]
Therefore abiding by the min/max buy-in rules when switching tables, and subsequently having to remove some chips from play, is NOT equivalent to ratholing. [/ QUOTE ] Holy friggin' cow batman, NOT, switching tables is NOT equivalent to ratholing. That makes a big difference! I've been asking around town and opinions remain mixed on this, with probably about 2/3 taking the opposite stance as myself. However, no one has convinced me to change my mind yet. I see some of the biggest casinos in the country do it differently than the typical LV casino (they make you bring it all, regardless of capped buy-ins). Therefore the reasons why should be looked at more closely (most of the opposite camp from me took a hard and fast opinion with little thought before they answered).
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
