NYU Dave v. NYU Dave 100/200 NL: Two hands.

[BobboFitos]

[ QUOTE ]
I think both are calls, though the 2nd one is a lot easier than the 1st one. In order for a good player to have you in hand 2, he needs to have had you beat before the river. Maybe he turned Qs full, but gl to him if that's the case.


[/ QUOTE ]
sup cero. curious why you feel this is the case, bc i feel the opposite. bc id strongly consider mucking here.

first seems like a pretty routine call, also. and fwiw, id bet the flop.

[Shady Poker]

[ QUOTE ]
he's just a rich donk with money so he's in every hand trying to find ways to get rocks who are UNDEROLLED like you to fold best hands.

[/ QUOTE ]

Is this accurate about villain? since if this is true it makes calling much easier

[rock1]

likoping = coward for running his mouth anonymously on an internet board...Man Up "Bro"

dlpnyc21 = very nice guy...one of few quality hand posters these days

Hand 1 - i definitely cbet the flop here...other than that i like your line...having played with NYU Dave (and dlp), I think the walking away/making faces is actually very strong...also, while he is the type to do it, i still dont see that many river checkraise bluffs these days...last, if he has played hundreds of hours with you, he knows you have a propensity to call in these situations with any hand of reasonable strength...all that said, i make a call (he plays like a random number generator sometimes) and expect to lose

hand 2- dont love the flop checkraise, i think i would have saved it for the turn...all in all, dont think the line is bad though...instacall for me on the river...

[xxThe_Lebowskixx]

arent you scared cops or someone else will rob you playing with this much cash?

[Jackal69]

[ QUOTE ]
oh god, you are such a huge moron. where should i start?

"The real slim shady is a highly unpredictable player who has been on a massive massive rush lately in the NYC cash games. His confidence, therefore, is at an absolute all-time high."

"the real slim shady"? get real you loser. you try to make him and yourself sound so important in these moronic posts all the time i find it laughably absurd but now just annoying. stop trying to make him sound like a crazy villain capable of anything. he's just a rich donk with money so he's in every hand trying to find ways to get rocks who are UNDEROLLED like you to fold best hands.

you seem to have impossible decisions every hand when youre three handed and flop trips with monster kicker against him. i cant wait till you play with real players and you muck 2nd pair constantly when it's good 99% of the time.

i think you're a really awful player and am starting to get sick of these posts making yourself sound like you can actually play b/c you made a couple bucks in the livest game in the country. you would get chewed up by anybody who could really play and seem to already have your hands full with a megadonk in nyudave (i mean "the real slim shady").

get a grip. you're not a cool guy, youre a dork and a lousy poker player.

p.s. i know both these dave cats and have played with them before. i kept quiet for a while but this cats out of control and needs a reality check.

[/ QUOTE ]


förbjuda [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[Boosted J]

[ QUOTE ]
oh god, you are such a huge moron. where should i start?

"The real slim shady is a highly unpredictable player who has been on a massive massive rush lately in the NYC cash games. His confidence, therefore, is at an absolute all-time high."

"the real slim shady"? get real you loser. you try to make him and yourself sound so important in these moronic posts all the time i find it laughably absurd but now just annoying. stop trying to make him sound like a crazy villain capable of anything. he's just a rich donk with money so he's in every hand trying to find ways to get rocks who are UNDEROLLED like you to fold best hands.

you seem to have impossible decisions every hand when youre three handed and flop trips with monster kicker against him. i cant wait till you play with real players and you muck 2nd pair constantly when it's good 99% of the time.

i think you're a really awful player and am starting to get sick of these posts making yourself sound like you can actually play b/c you made a couple bucks in the livest game in the country. you would get chewed up by anybody who could really play and seem to already have your hands full with a megadonk in nyudave (i mean "the real slim shady").

get a grip. you're not a cool guy, youre a dork and a lousy poker player.

p.s. i know both these dave cats and have played with them before. i kept quiet for a while but this cats out of control and needs a reality check.

[/ QUOTE ]

I've known gaucho/NYU Dave #2 for quite a long time, 1+ year, chatting with him on AIM. He has a little different way of talking about a few things. These posts are in no way "brags" for him, he just posts his hands. Can he get annoying sometimes? Sure, I tell him he does all the time. I probably am a little weird and annoying also. We play [censored] online poker, of course we're going to be a little weird. You're the most annoying one though. If you see a post by Gaucho, don't open it, duhhh.

Although I see Gaucho playing in tough games online semi-frequently that he is -EV in(and I tell him so on AIM...under my real name), he actually still doesn't chunk off a bunch because of his style, so it's not horrible horrible. This is a public forum, lots of stuff here annoys me too, but leave the kid alone.

P.S. I thought the "real slim shady" getup was clever.

[cero_z]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I think both are calls, though the 2nd one is a lot easier than the 1st one. In order for a good player to have you in hand 2, he needs to have had you beat before the river. Maybe he turned Qs full, but gl to him if that's the case.


[/ QUOTE ]
sup cero. curious why you feel this is the case, bc i feel the opposite. bc id strongly consider mucking here.


[/ QUOTE ]

You know, I somehow missed that he could have 53s, 75s, 87s, etc. He called getting just over 2:1 on the turn, after calling a c/r on the flop. I don't expect him to have just a flush draw, and if he does, milking you for 8k when he gets there is not going to get it done. Even with a big draw, he's getting into trouble gambling on paired boards there; it's going to be very tough for the implied odds to favor him enough when he gets there to get enough value to make drawing worthwhile.

In other news, likoping is a little bitch, Gaucho is a cool guy and his posts from these games are excellent, and EM2 made a good call about likoping sounding like Grandiose. EM2 is making good contributions to this board now, and I for one am going to lay off of him.

[Greeksquared]

[ QUOTE ]

Hand 1:

Turn is a 3. I now have trips. He leads weak (400). I raise to 1500. Again, I'm really not sure how much merit there is in raising here , but I decided to do so for value, obviously.

[/ QUOTE ]

This statement makes me think you lost the hand. I think there is no question about the merits of raising the turn. It's the easiest decision of the hand. You must raise here, unless you are very certain that the only hand he ever weak leads is a set, and then you should just call down. Your hand is very well disguised.

[Wayneo]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Hand 1:

Turn is a 3. I now have trips. He leads weak (400). I raise to 1500. Again, I'm really not sure how much merit there is in raising here , but I decided to do so for value, obviously.

[/ QUOTE ]

This statement makes me think you lost the hand. I think there is no question about the merits of raising the turn. It's the easiest decision of the hand. You must raise here, unless you are very certain that the only hand he ever weak leads is a set, and then you should just call down. Your hand is very well disguised.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree, I raise here. Unfortunate he has A3 though.

[Daut44]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I think both are calls, though the 2nd one is a lot easier than the 1st one. In order for a good player to have you in hand 2, he needs to have had you beat before the river. Maybe he turned Qs full, but gl to him if that's the case.


[/ QUOTE ]
sup cero. curious why you feel this is the case, bc i feel the opposite. bc id strongly consider mucking here.


[/ QUOTE ]

You know, I somehow missed that he could have 53s, 75s, 87s, etc. He called getting just over 2:1 on the turn, after calling a c/r on the flop. I don't expect him to have just a flush draw, and if he does, milking you for 8k when he gets there is not going to get it done. Even with a big draw, he's getting into trouble gambling on paired boards there; it's going to be very tough for the implied odds to favor him enough when he gets there to get enough value to make drawing worthwhile.

In other news, likoping is a little bitch, Gaucho is a cool guy and his posts from these games are excellent, and EM2 made a good call about likoping sounding like Grandiose. EM2 is making good contributions to this board now, and I for one am going to lay off of him.

[/ QUOTE ]

totally missed this as well. (the combo draws)
i fold the 2nd