Checkup, one-liner answer is fine

[Bill King]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
A lot better to see five cards with AK. Lots of equity vs his range. Hell yea I shove KK and AA too with two guys left to act.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

[wpr101]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
What would everyone do with AK here?

[/ QUOTE ]
shove

[/ QUOTE ]

What if you think villian only makes the RR with QQ+, AK?

[EgoSlasher]

I like a 4bet, why are all of you folding?

[EgoSlasher]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
What would everyone do with AK here?

[/ QUOTE ]
shove

[/ QUOTE ]

What if you think villian only makes the RR with QQ+, AK?

[/ QUOTE ]

Then he's a nit, fold and move on.

[EgoSlasher]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
problem with calling is if one of the others comes along too you're in a really tough spot.. which is why folding is what i'd do here prob.

[/ QUOTE ]

But I think we are mostly draw to set value which we have odds to do I think. And possible check down value however unlikely.

[/ QUOTE ]


Or he has 33 and is squeezing, he may even lay down queens here

[BalugaWhale]

if villain was iluvwnba then you should strongly consider pushing

generally call

[ahnuld]

generally call cause we gots position, but I think 4 betting is better than folding. We can easily get AQ maybe even AK to fold to a 4 bet incorrectly.

[MDMA]

Call, CALL and cALL.

[ahnuld]

I liked MDMA's posts better when he took 3 pages. I mean, I knew alot of what he was saying, but it was still a good refresher to jog my memory every day of the reasons behind the "standard" play. guess everybody burns out eventually.

[Requin]

The reasoning is because shoving just runs you right into queens. I thought at the time the guys behind me made raise > call, but considering the reraise size that's probably not the case, thanks guys.