Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > STT Strategy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 09-22-2006, 12:33 AM
Ditch Digger Ditch Digger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: TBD
Posts: 1,880
Default Re: 530 Floating a Mid Pair

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
All I know is that if I bet into you on the turn here you're drawing dead.

[/ QUOTE ]

Good thing you weren't the villian [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Played with you a bunch tonite, you know my SN right?

[/ QUOTE ]

Alright, I'm now convinced this post is for meta game purposes at the 530s.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-22-2006, 12:34 AM
epiLog epiLog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: All-in
Posts: 356
Default Re: 530 Floating a Mid Pair

This isn't a raise I make at the level I play but here I see nothing wrong with it since we are on the button and up against only 1 limper which we know is solid. Is 270 your standard raise after 1 limper at 30/60? Seems a little on the high side, maybe he's putting you on AK or AQ and makes a feeler bet on the flop to see how you react. I think I like a flop raise more then the line you took and just dump it if you get called.


EDIT
--------------------------------
I guees you can just forget what I just said. Misread the hand and thought the limper was the one who called you. sry.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-22-2006, 12:34 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Post deleted by Mat Sklansky

Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 09-22-2006, 12:36 AM
Shillx Shillx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 10,661
Default Re: 530 Floating a Mid Pair

[ QUOTE ]
All I know is that if I bet into you on the turn here you're drawing dead.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah exactly and if you have to make this play don't do it with 66. If you do it with KQ that is one thing but you might as well have 72o in this situation.

edited
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 09-22-2006, 12:37 AM
slimbob slimbob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 610
Default Re: 530 Floating a Mid Pair

Villian cant fold toppair or better here. The pot is too big. But: Flop and turnbet look so weak that I think your push is ok.

We should make a poll about the raise with 66 and I am happy to vote with my 2 fake accounts for raise so you get again 3 votes for raise.... (big big grin...)
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 09-22-2006, 12:39 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Post deleted by Mat Sklansky

Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 09-22-2006, 12:44 AM
Jay Riall Jay Riall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Over the line
Posts: 15,184
Default Re: 530 Floating a Mid Pair

I think the main question of this hand is can villain fold AJ here? Because your FE of a TP type hand is where your equity is going to come from on this hand.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 09-22-2006, 12:45 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Post deleted by Mat Sklansky

Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 09-22-2006, 12:45 AM
slimbob slimbob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 610
Default Re: 530 Floating a Mid Pair

[ QUOTE ]
J, KJ, maybe QJ, AT, possibly QQ or even KK/AA

I put all that in his range with KK/AA being pretty unlikely but in there. I'd also add JTs and set's here...I think he only calls with the sets 100%, JTs 80% and QQ-AA he'd call probably 50-75% of the time.

[/ QUOTE ]

Degen he cant fold TPTK or better because of the potsize. And nobody ever fold here JT! This is impossible. Do you really think somebody could fold top 2 pair or overpair here?
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 09-22-2006, 12:48 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Post deleted by Mat Sklansky

Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.