![]() |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] It's the exact opposite. You can visually count the chips knocked over and then know how many are in each stack. [/ QUOTE ] Of course the clever kids put out two stacks of 4 chips, and one stack of 5 and knock the stack of 5 over, thus "proving" that each stack has 5 chips. [/ QUOTE ] If a dealer or another player can't visually count a 4 or 5 stack that is placed over the line then there is something seriously wrong. You're making up things that just don't happen. [/ QUOTE ] Is THAT what I'm doing? Drat. I was trying to do something else. I thought I was pointing out as incorrect the theory that splashing the last stack somehow confirmed the size of the other stacks. Silly me. |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Is THAT what I'm doing? Drat. I was trying to do something else. I thought I was pointing out as incorrect the theory that splashing the last stack somehow confirmed the size of the other stacks. Silly you. [/ QUOTE ] |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
All I know is that in a 3/6 structure, raising the turn is 4/4/4. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
All I know is that in a 3/6 structure, raising the turn is 4/4/4. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] haha dude i hate that. it throws me off when i wanna 3-bet. |
![]() |
|
|