![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Greatest Relief Pitcher | |||
| Dennis Eckersley |
|
55 | 29.26% |
| Rollie Fingers |
|
11 | 5.85% |
| Mariano Rivera |
|
101 | 53.72% |
| Bruce Sutter |
|
5 | 2.66% |
| Hoyt Wilhelm |
|
11 | 5.85% |
| Somebody Else |
|
5 | 2.66% |
| Voters: 188. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
I wouldnt dare try and run off less experienced players. The entry fee hasnt changed in 34 years!!! I just believe its time that it do, isnt it?? Just to maintain the same prestige it had back then. Can we atleast agree that $10,000 doesnt go as far as it did in 1972. Thats all im saying. Prestige probably isnt the proper word but i hope you kinda get my drift.
MRV |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
For sure. Basically stupid/bad players should be discouraged to play. [/ QUOTE ] lolololol any winning player with half a brain wants 100,000 pure donks buying in every year. discouraging bad players from entering is the dumbest thing I've ever heard. |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[/ QUOTE ] I thnk we can all agree on 10,000, since that got a plurality of the votes. [/ QUOTE ] How about we agree it is NOT $10,000 since that got a majority of the votes. [/ QUOTE ] moran |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
For sure. Basically stupid/bad players should be discouraged to play. That will surely help the games overall and bring many new players online to sats/cash games. This will also surely ensure only good players win because when the stakes are higher luck doesn't matter as much. Good idea. [/ QUOTE ] This post must be a joke, otherwise LOL |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
i initially voted for $20k, but it seems like a smart move for all involved to bump it to $15k, since the extra $5k isn't much for the pros (sponsored or not) and it would probably increase biz for satellites prior to the tourney. IIRC, a pretty large amount of those entered this year were online qualifiers, so what might have been a $40 sattelite like Moneymaker entered might be what, $45 or $50?
It'd sure make for a whopping 1st place prize ($20 million or more, increasing prestige, thus more would enter) and the Rio would pocket a couple extra bucks for whatever % of the entry fee goes to the house. |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Raising the buyin to weed out the donks is the tourney version of "I need to move up so they respect my raises!"
|
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
L-O-L good sir, L-O-L
|
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
It should be a 10000 dollar buy in cash game. Winner take all.
|
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
By all means, if you really want to kill off the poker boom...go ahead and make it harder for the average shmoe to play in the Main Event
|
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
the buyin should at least increase in line with inflation, otherwise it becomes cheaper and cheaper every year, and I'm sure no-one would vote for that.
|
![]() |
|
|