|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Status of seat 8's hand | |||
| His hand is LIVE, it never touched the muck, therefore it still plays |
   
|
23 | 20.18% |
| His hand is DEAD and buried |
  
|
91 | 79.82% |
| Voters: 114. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#22
07-30-2006, 03:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Which would you nail?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I hate to tell you boys, but 20 and experienced is kind of an oxymoron. [/ QUOTE ] Not if they started at 14-15 [/ QUOTE ] There is a hell of a lot more involved in experience than how many times they have [censored]. Most 20 year old chicks have maturity/confidence problems still. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah but that's not strictly a matter of experience, either. Heck, some experienced people are really lousy. 
|
|
#23
07-30-2006, 03:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which would you nail?
[ QUOTE ]
Black hair isn't even an option? Wow, here's one guy that is ONLY into white chicks so much that the thought of some variety doesn't even OCCUR to him. Sheesh. [/ QUOTE ] I always thought "brunette" encompasses all dark hair, including black.
|
|
#24
07-30-2006, 04:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which would you nail?
Why are the 16 yr olds doing so well?
|
|
#25
07-30-2006, 04:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which would you nail?
going out on a limb here, but I'ma have to guess... because they are 16!!
(Ba-dum, BING!) In all honesty it's probably because there are quite a few younger posters on here who presumably want a younger girl. As has been beaten completely to death on these forums, we are largely a group of young virgins who are under the impression that having sex with virgins would be a good experience.
|
|
#26
07-30-2006, 04:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which would you nail?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Black hair isn't even an option? Wow, here's one guy that is ONLY into white chicks so much that the thought of some variety doesn't even OCCUR to him. Sheesh. [/ QUOTE ] I always thought "brunette" encompasses all dark hair, including black. [/ QUOTE ] I've never used it or thought of it that way. I grew up with mostly black-haired people, and none of us ever thought of it that way, either. We used brunette to describe people with brown hair only. Perhaps doing otherwise is an accepted usage among some peoples, but it would have been thought an odd mistake among black-haired people. Hard for me to picture calling a Chinese person with jet-black hair a brunette.
|
|
#27
07-30-2006, 04:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which would you nail?
I expected pics.
|
|
#28
07-30-2006, 04:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which would you nail?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Black hair isn't even an option? Wow, here's one guy that is ONLY into white chicks so much that the thought of some variety doesn't even OCCUR to him. Sheesh. [/ QUOTE ] I always thought "brunette" encompasses all dark hair, including black. [/ QUOTE ] I've never used it or thought of it that way. I grew up with mostly black-haired people, and none of us ever thought of it that way, either. We used brunette to describe people with brown hair only. Perhaps doing otherwise is an accepted usage among some peoples, but it would have been thought an odd mistake among black-haired people. Hard for me to picture calling a Chinese person with jet-black hair a brunette. [/ QUOTE ] FWIW, the wikipedia page echoes most of these sentiments. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brunette
|
|
#30
07-30-2006, 06:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which would you nail?
Good to see I'm not the only sicko that voted jungle.Women are mammals,they're supposed to be covered in fur.I don't even like shaved legs.Pre-pubescent girls have smooth legs.Women have hair.
I've always thought the obbsession with smooth legs was pretty disgusting. Then again,I'm an old hippy so I voted 30+,experienced,redhead,jungle.Fortunately I'm married to that desription and she hasn't scraped/waxed her legs to look like a little kid in 11+ years.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
