Winrate vs. variance thread...how much would you pay to not lose?

[Equal]

Yeah I wouldnt give up more than 10% of my hourly rate. I would only consider because I just bought a house and have more financial responsibilities etc.

[cardsharkk04]

Yea, you guys are a bunch of pussies

[TStoneMBD]

Post deleted by TStoneMBD

[Kilillan]

Eh

I'd say 35%

mainly because I lose that much from tilt from downswings.

[Jamougha]

Huh?

What the [censored] would be the point in playing if you couldn't loose?

[NHFunkii]

[ QUOTE ]
I wouldn't find the game interesting at all if there were no downswings.

[/ QUOTE ]

word, does that mean I have a gambling problem?

[FoxwoodsFiend]

[ QUOTE ]
Huh?

What the [censored] would be the point in playing if you couldn't loose?

[/ QUOTE ]

[Keepitsimple]

omfg

[adanthar]

[ QUOTE ]
i wouldnt pay anything I dont think. I'd definitely take more money for more variance though

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd take *either* far more variance or far less.

(Far more = my winrate is higher so the swings hurt less, heh)

[NHFunkii]

I'm assuming he means relatively more variance