![]() |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Every other hand in a Pokerstars tournament is A(x) v. A (x-1). [/ QUOTE ] I'm confused; A is a function of x? |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Seriously, there all adding blackjack. The only big ones that are not are Pokerstars and truepoker. This is sickning. I really hope Stars NEVER adds blackjack. Anyone agree? No, I dont care about there bottom line. thx [/ QUOTE ] "Not" having it (when every other site does) could be used as a competitive advantage for them. Not having it would go along with their current image and advertising (Poker Stars). They also have the "best" customer service, and Lee Jones, yes, "Lee Jones" himself actually takes time out of his day to come here and answer average-Joe's poker concerns about his Site. Stars should definitey not ever have BJ. It would ruin (however slightly) it's image as a "skill-promoting" home-of World Champions image (wonder how much cash Joe Hachem got for the endorsement - I imagine they went to him and said, "name your price," Joe...lol). They'd be better off opening an online casino under another name (and not ever having a direct link BJ button in their lobby, etc. - though a nice BJ by a highly skilled practitioner would be nice right about now... [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]). |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
damn casinos. went to vegas over the weekend and they all have roulette and craps. what the hell? are there any true casinos left?
|
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
"The BJ Option might be very attractive"
Usually is ... |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
bottom line is that sites only care about your money. Blackjack is just another way for them to collect. Imagine playing a multi for 6 hours, winning couple hunded bucks and then blowing it on blackjack in 3 minutes. I'd slam my nuts in my drawer.
|
![]() |
|
|