How many 5 year-olds..... - Page 29

private joker · #**281** 01-20-2005, 04:38 AM

Bring it on, motherfu[/b]ckers!!!

Reef · #**282** 01-20-2005, 04:51 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
so what about bruce lee vs. the 5 year olds?

I'm saying he could take ALL of them

[/ QUOTE ]

Wrong. Bruce probably couldn't take 2x the ammount of kids we could

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd be willing to put down a jackson that he could. Too bad no way to test it (poll?).

Tron · #**283** 01-20-2005, 05:00 AM

[ QUOTE ]

Bring it on, motherfu[/b]ckers!!!

[/ QUOTE ]

AK-47 IS THE TOOL! DON'T MAKE ME ACT A MOTHAFUKKIN' FOOL! -Ice Cube of NWA

Chobohoya · #**284** 01-21-2005, 04:51 AM

This thread is one of the best reasons I can think of for the existence of the internet. Good work all.

deacsoft · #**285** 01-21-2005, 05:19 AM

[ QUOTE ]
What is the most a 5 year old can weigh? 60 lbs??

[/ QUOTE ]

(just in case the pic doesn't work: Fat Kid

radek · #**286** 01-24-2005, 02:52 AM

Me VS 1 5 year old I think the 5 year old wins. I am out of shape and drink too much beer!

Dr. Strangelove · #**287** 01-24-2005, 09:20 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I think the number is a lot less than people think, and definitely less than 30.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree. I heard about an 800 pound tiger getting killed by a pack of 30-40 wild dogs. I think the five year olds would have you on the ground pretty quick and that's the ballgame.

[/ QUOTE ]

there's NO WAY you can analogize a room full of 5 year-olds to a pack of wild dogs. the dogs will be MUCH BETTER at working as a team, both instinctually and from their life experiences. also, the dogs would know where to attack to take the prey/opponent down and incapacitate it fastest, and they would strike quickly and effectively. one day of training could not bring 5 year-olds up to this level.

[/ QUOTE ]

We are talking about a huge tiger (even for a tiger 800 pounds is huge) and while five year olds are not wild dogs, you are not a tiger. Wild dogs are small and incredibly weak in comparison to a large tiger. In fact, I think most 2+2ers could take a wild dog in hand to hand combat; we outweigh them by a lot, are stronger, and most of us are smarter.

Yet the difference between an 800 pound tiger and a grown human is greater than a grown human and a 5 year old human. I think most of you are underestimating the problem that being vastly outnumbered poses, regardless of the strength of the individuals.

So given this difference, I think you will get an upper bound on the number of 5 year olds a 2+2er can take by figuring out how many unarmed 2+2ers it would take to kill an 800 pound tiger.

I think this number is somewhere between 15 and 40.

A related question would be, how many ants can you take? The answer is not all of them.

kemystery · #**288** 01-24-2005, 09:46 AM

Bruce Lee would shred those little tykes, 100 at least - the man could kill a full grown man with one blow

#**289** 01-24-2005, 10:55 AM

[ QUOTE ]
Also, does the fact that I might have a hard time really hitting a 5 year old matter? Or should I just assume that if the situation were to arise I could go after them full on?

[/ QUOTE ]

Assume they are rabid.

Dr. Strangelove · #**290** 01-24-2005, 11:09 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Also, does the fact that I might have a hard time really hitting a 5 year old matter? Or should I just assume that if the situation were to arise I could go after them full on?

[/ QUOTE ]

Assume they are rabid.

[/ QUOTE ]

Psh. These are 5 year olds. This should be reason enough.