|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Where would you rank Carolina? | |||
| 3rd |
   
|
3 | 8.57% |
| 4th |
  
|
3 | 8.57% |
| 5th |
  
|
8 | 22.86% |
| 6th |
  
|
9 | 25.71% |
| 7th |
  
|
7 | 20.00% |
| 8th |
  
|
2 | 5.71% |
| 9th |
|
3 | 8.57% |
| Voters: 35. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#271
09-09-2007, 08:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HIgh Stakes Poker 4 thread (8/27)
[ QUOTE ]
Sick Episode. Phil Hellmuth > Mike Matusow > AIDS > Brian Brandon [/ QUOTE ] well played sir 
|
|
#272
09-10-2007, 07:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: HIgh Stakes Poker 4 thread (8/27)
[ QUOTE ]
How busted do you think Matusow got after this show? It took as much self-control as he had to lay down those Kings, and only then because he only had one buy-in. Every ounce in his body wanted to call, but even he couldn't. I bet he called every bet on the river with an overpair for the next month after that show. [/ QUOTE ] I belive Mike took his "revenge" instantly on other players by playing very strong in the next episode. Mike just did not want to bust on the very first hand. I just never understood his reasoning behind the hand.. if Matusow but Helmuth on JJ/QQ/AK/AA pf why could not he just 4-barrelled pf and get the money in as a favourite against the range. If he did not want to bust, why on earth did he opt out to call on turn when the blank river hit?
|
|
#273
09-10-2007, 10:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: HIgh Stakes Poker 4 thread (8/27)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I just never understood his reasoning behind the hand.. if Matusow but Helmuth on JJ/QQ/AK/AA pf why could not he just 4-barrelled pf and get the money in as a favourite against the range. If he did not want to bust, why on earth did he opt out to call on turn when the blank river hit? [/ QUOTE ] plzpzlplzlp tell me this is sarcastic
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
