![]() |
|
#2771
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Please do NOT turn this into a discussion about Gigabet. [/ QUOTE ] Arent we simply trying to get a full picture here? |
|
#2772
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
We haven't heard much from Gigabet since the ZeeJustin scandal other than rumours (see the NVG forums), but knowing they were friends, and knowing that the multi-account cheat supposedly was massively used in the two table step SNGS where Gigabet has been so succesful, I reread one of Gigabets post. In retrospect, what do we make of Gigabet's Poker Upbringing Post ? Especially this part: [ QUOTE ] On Sunday am, I play the 6am limit 109, and win that. I got HU with Danny Alaei, if anyone knows him. Good friend of mine. Then I play the big sunday event, and get 4th in that, can't remember how many were in that field, but first was around 80k. I am including monday in my weekend also, so no one gets confused. Monday, I play the party special, and win that, but even more impressive I think is that I made the final table of every single 109 mtt that ran that day starting with the 11am and finishing with the 11pm one. And I won 3 of those. I was playing as SwiftSteal in the 109 mtts, and Gigabet in the special. After that, I was sure online poker was rigged....but who cares, since it was obviously rigged for me. Then the Steps come....Party just can't be satisfied until I have 849704509768905760295 billion dollars. I absolutely crushed the step tournaments when they first came out as two table events , and I played every single one of them that ran in december. I was winning every other one of them, it seemed. Party was still rigged in my favor, yes! [/ QUOTE ] He clearly states he was playing on two seperate Partypoker accounts at the same time, doesnt he? Marnix [/ QUOTE ] wow, just wow. really makes you think what he really means by Party is rigged in my favor. |
|
#2773
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Please do NOT turn this into a discussion about Gigabet. [/ QUOTE ] Arent we simply trying to get a full picture here? [/ QUOTE ] Gigabet admitted to playing on two accounts in separate tournaments. Having multiple accounts, while a violation of Party's T&C, was/is a common practice of multi-tablers in STT. As long as he wasn't playing in the same tournament with different accounts than what you're talking about is something besides the main point of this thread. If you want to speculate that Gigabet was doing anything else which could be considered out of line, then pure speculation should go into the Gigabet thread started in NVG. |
|
#2774
|
|||
|
|||
|
And the ZJ blog sits silent...
|
|
#2775
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Please do NOT turn this into a discussion about Gigabet. [/ QUOTE ] Arent we simply trying to get a full picture here? [/ QUOTE ] Gigabet admitted to playing on two accounts in separate tournaments. [/ QUOTE ] He admits playing 2 accounts simultaneously if you ask me. It doesnt mean that he multiaccounted mtts but it means he knew how to log in and play two accounts at the same time. And thus that the possibilty to multiaccount was real for him. But fair enough, I'll take the speculation to the forum where it belongs. |
|
#2776
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Aside from the fact that the Model Rules do not govern in my jurisdiction, and are thus irrelevant, your analysis is so poor and libelous that I will actually respond to it at length later this afternoon (I dearly wish I could now) to show what an idiot you are. I will make you my bitch. I don't know where you went to school, but I'm pretty sure the diploma came in the mail. [/ QUOTE ] The last we heard from you, you were going to make jman "your bitch" as soon as you had the time yesterday afternoon. Over 24 hours later and not a peep from you. How disappointing. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
|
#2777
|
|||
|
|||
|
bump
|
|
#2778
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
bump [/ QUOTE ] No ghost bumps. Oops. That never gets old. |
|
#2779
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] bump [/ QUOTE ] No ghost bumps. Oops. That never gets old. [/ QUOTE ] Continuing to bump this thread like this is just going to increase the chances that a mod will lock it. |
|
#2780
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] bump [/ QUOTE ] No ghost bumps. Oops. That never gets old. [/ QUOTE ] Continuing to bump this thread like this is just going to increase the chances that a mod will lock it. [/ QUOTE ] You are very correct. No more "bumps". |
![]() |
|
|