ZeeJustin the next to get caught multi accounting Party MTTs - Page 243

Losing all · #**2421** 02-27-2006, 05:41 PM

[ QUOTE ]
PS As far as Zeejustin, I am aware that he is very seriously contemplating legal action against Party.

[/ QUOTE ]

Just when I was starting to think my opinion of him couldn't get any lower.

To his pals- I know, He's just a silly kid and we all did dumb things at that age, blah, blah, blah.

bocablkr · #**2422** 02-27-2006, 05:44 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Theoretically Speaking: Could ZJ (or anyone for that matter) have used his multiple accounts to play at the same cash game table or SNGs? Or was his multi accounting ability strictly isolated to MTTs?

[/ QUOTE ]Can anyone answer this?

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, the answer is obvious - yes. But there is a limit to how many would still be +ev. I think someone said it is 3 or 4 players. Beyond that you are -ev. If you had 9 people at a 10 person $11 SNG you would pay $99 to win $100 if you won every single time. Lose once every 100 times and you still only break even. Lose more than that - forget about it.

[/ QUOTE ]

How sure are you that he can do this? Wouldn't the sites block him from being able to sit in a cash game using his multiple accounts? (IP address similarities)?

[/ QUOTE ]

He has admitted that he was able to get at least two accounts to the same table in an MTT. Don't know if the software detects SNG's differently. But if someone actually used different IP's then it is definitely possible.

TimM · #**2423** 02-27-2006, 05:44 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
For everybody who said that the most he can cash out at one time is $10,000, is that just for Neteller, or is that the max for checks too?

[/ QUOTE ]

Are you worried - just kidding. Don't know about their check policy.

[/ QUOTE ]

$7,500 max.

On the cashout screen, the only form of payment with no maximum is the wire transfer, with a $35 fee. If I just won a big multi I would use this right away if only to get my money out and safe from hackers.

Nick B. · #**2424** 02-27-2006, 05:45 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
For everybody who said that the most he can cash out at one time is $10,000, is that just for Neteller, or is that the max for checks too?

[/ QUOTE ]

Are you worried - just kidding. Don't know about their check policy.

[/ QUOTE ]

No, there must be a way to get more than 10k off the site at a time. If there isn't,, I won't be playing any huge multis on Pokerstars knowing that if I win I would have to wait 20 or more weeks to get all my money.

Edit: Thanks for the info Tim.

BassMasterK · #**2425** 02-27-2006, 05:46 PM

[ QUOTE ]
PS As far as Zeejustin, I am aware that he is very seriously contemplating legal action against Party.

[/ QUOTE ]

My God I didn't know he could make a bigger ass out of himself. I now stand corrected.

*start sarcasm*
I am sure that if he does this, there will be no problems with him continuing his internet career as an honest player. I am sure all the sites will welcome him with open arms.
*end sarcasm*

TimM · #**2426** 02-27-2006, 05:49 PM

Now it might be a bit suspicious if six accounts supposedly with different owners all suddenly decided to wire money to the same place.

Edit: My info was from the Party cashier. I didn't look at Stars.

BluffTHIS! · #**2427** 02-27-2006, 05:50 PM

[ QUOTE ]
PS As far as Zeejustin, I am aware that he is very seriously contemplating legal action against Party.

[/ QUOTE ]

Out of curiosity, how are you aware of this?

And why do you think ZJ doesn't realize that the first step on the long multi-year road to recovering his reputation, is taking full responsibility and accepting all punishments?

jman220 · #**2428** 02-27-2006, 06:05 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Theoretically Speaking: Could ZJ (or anyone for that matter) have used his multiple accounts to play at the same cash game table or SNGs? Or was his multi accounting ability strictly isolated to MTTs?

[/ QUOTE ]Can anyone answer this?

[/ QUOTE ]

So long as he had different IP's for the different accounts, I don't see why not. Hell, even just using a router is enough. Back whne I first started playing, me and a friend used to play at the same table online, from the same router. No, we weren't cheating, we just liked playing against each other. Party never said anything. Maybe its improved since then, but who knows. And certainly if he had more than one cable modem, or more than one ISP, he could do it.

Kneel B4 Zod · #**2429** 02-27-2006, 06:07 PM

[ QUOTE ]
And why do you think ZJ doesn't realize that the first step on the long multi-year road to recovering his reputation, is taking full responsibility and accepting all punishments?

[/ QUOTE ]

b/c he may not (probably doesn't) accept that he did anything wrong.

The Ocho · #**2430** 02-27-2006, 06:10 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
PS As far as Zeejustin, I am aware that he is very seriously contemplating legal action against Party.

[/ QUOTE ]

Out of curiosity, how are you aware of this?

And why do you think ZJ doesn't realize that the first step on the long multi-year road to recovering his reputation, is taking full responsibility and accepting all punishments?

[/ QUOTE ]

just speculating, but perhaps 100 grand and the ability to play on partypoker again is worth more to zeejustin than his reputation amongst those who feel wronged by him.