Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Who should I play?
W. Dunn @ Cin 6 35.29%
S. Alexander(if he plays) @ KC 3 17.65%
T. Henry Vs. Hou 8 47.06%
M. Jones-Drew @ Phi 0 0%
F. Taylor @ Phi 0 0%
Voters: 17. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #2341  
Old 08-29-2007, 12:35 AM
SMIGLET SMIGLET is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 343
Default Re: ****Official 2007 NY Mets NL East Champs Thread****

[ QUOTE ]
The bullpen flat out sucks. Funny how it was our strong point until about a month ago and now its the weakest.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #2342  
Old 08-29-2007, 01:36 AM
metsandfinsfan metsandfinsfan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Long Island
Posts: 22,346
Default Re: ****Official 2007 NY Mets NL East Champs Thread****

i really want them to put pedro as the 8th inning guy
Reply With Quote
  #2343  
Old 08-29-2007, 09:56 PM
niss niss is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: yankee the wankee?
Posts: 4,489
Default Re: ****Official 2007 NY Mets NL East Champs Thread****

CAN THE METS PULL ONE OF THESE OUT ONE TIME PLEASE
Reply With Quote
  #2344  
Old 08-29-2007, 10:00 PM
niss niss is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: yankee the wankee?
Posts: 4,489
Default Re: ****Official 2007 NY Mets NL East Champs Thread****

Jesus Christ that is terrible ... the play not the call. The call was the right call, totally unnecessary play. Just give the games away, Mets.
Reply With Quote
  #2345  
Old 08-29-2007, 10:04 PM
JordanIB JordanIB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,167
Default Re: ****Official 2007 NY Mets NL East Champs Thread****

wow, just wow
Reply With Quote
  #2346  
Old 08-29-2007, 10:14 PM
kbfc kbfc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 791
Default Re: ****Official 2007 NY Mets NL East Champs Thread****

between this and [censored] pokerstars today, it's full on life-tilt....
Reply With Quote
  #2347  
Old 08-29-2007, 11:15 PM
Suigin406 Suigin406 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: fire isiah and minaya
Posts: 8,613
Default Re: ****Official 2007 NY Mets NL East Champs Thread****

isn't this real [censored] wonderful, i need a break from this garbage
Reply With Quote
  #2348  
Old 08-30-2007, 07:26 AM
JordanIB JordanIB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,167
Default Re: ****Official 2007 NY Mets NL East Champs Thread****

question because I'm too lazy to look at the rule book:

What's the difference between what Marlon did and bowling over the catcher? I assume there's a specific allowance for it for the catcher only?
Reply With Quote
  #2349  
Old 08-30-2007, 09:04 AM
hedxcold hedxcold is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 496
Default Re: ****Official 2007 NY Mets NL East Champs Thread****

don't know what the rule says word for word, but i would imagine its because the catcher generally blocks the plate, and you have a right to get to it. the second baseman wasn't blocking marlon from getting to second base.
Reply With Quote
  #2350  
Old 08-30-2007, 09:36 AM
JordanIB JordanIB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,167
Default Re: ****Official 2007 NY Mets NL East Champs Thread****

[ QUOTE ]
don't know what the rule says word for word, but i would imagine its because the catcher generally blocks the plate, and you have a right to get to it. the second baseman wasn't blocking marlon from getting to second base.

[/ QUOTE ]

I suppose. You could then interpret the ARod slap play to be legal, in that he was trying to clear a path to the base.

Honestly, I don't have a problem with this call in isolation. The main problem I have is with how subjectively these types of judgment calls are often applied.

Looks like 709(d) is the rule:

[ QUOTE ]
(e) If, in the judgment of the umpire, a base runner willfully and deliberately interferes with a batted ball or a fielder in the act of fielding a batted ball with the obvious intent to break up a double play, the ball is dead. The umpire shall call the runner out for interference and also call out the batter-runner because of the action of his teammate. In no event may bases be run or runs scored because of such action by a runner.

[/ QUOTE ]

Players "deliberately interfere...with the intent of breaking up double play all the time". Sliding late, sliding to the side of the bag with legs sticking out, etc. It happens even more often at home plate, on home-to-first DPs. The catcher's legs always get clipped. But because those are rarely last plays of a game, they don't get called as interference.

Oh well. Win today and we're back to 4 with some breathing room. Either way, it's the Phillies, so it's likely one big tease again, as they do every year.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.