|
|
#213
04-04-2006, 02:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: why even charge rake if you are going to give it back?
I dunno how the heck they are updating this stuff. I've got 566 FPPs and my "rake econimozed since monday 3 april = $60.81" which was around $55 before I just played a short 100 hand session or so at $1/2.
I'm pretty confused. 
|
|
#215
04-04-2006, 02:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: WSEX = RAKE FREE!
[ QUOTE ]
Actually, if there is no rake, one can play more hands profitably, so the games will be looser even if populated by more sharks [/ QUOTE ] Most people will just play the same as they normally do though. If they were weak-tight rocks on other sites then they will remain so at WPEX. They are not very likely to determine that there are a few more hands that suddenly become +EV because of the lack of rake.
|
|
#220
04-04-2006, 03:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: WSEX = RAKE FREE!
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Alobar Looking 4 the perfect drug Reged: 11/05/03 Posts: 11062 Loc: preparing for the moving up in... The difference between me and you is that I couldnt give a rats ass about post count. [/ QUOTE ] Could have fooled me. [/ QUOTE ] crap, you got me. I didnt make all those posts because I wanted to work on my poker game or because I enjoy talking to other people in the 2+2 community. I made them all because I wanted a big post count. Each morning when I woke up, I set a post goal for the day, and then at night I would look at the total number I had and giggle with excitement. I secretly hope 2+2 opens some kind of store where you can cash in your post count for goods. I could get a 2+2 t-shirt and a stress ball. [/ QUOTE ] Timer, you have just been: pwned. ZZZZZZZZZZZZiiiing!
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
