Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Internet Gambling > Affiliates/RakeBack
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #211  
Old 04-10-2006, 10:47 PM
SackUp SackUp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Undefeated as a Lawyer!
Posts: 6,580
Default Re: Reduce the rake is SCUM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
do you work for reducetherake??

[/ QUOTE ]

i think it's a one-man operation. maybe this guy is going to find him and rough him up? he did post his name and location

[/ QUOTE ]

There will be no roughing up. This is America, we settle things by the law.
  #212  
Old 04-10-2006, 11:02 PM
Aukai Aukai is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: NOLA
Posts: 275
Default Re: Reduce the rake is SCUM

See Tim's profile, then laugh at this page.

http://www.starcitygames.com/php/new...p?Article=6161
  #213  
Old 04-10-2006, 11:13 PM
The4Aces The4Aces is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,350
Default Re: Reduce the rake is SCUM

i doubt there is much u can do in the courts. They dont like dealing with gambling things.

But, he is still a huge scumbag.
  #214  
Old 04-10-2006, 11:23 PM
morgant morgant is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,948
Default Re: Reduce the rake is SCUM

i am flabergasted. the one response he makes in weeks is to defend his pride and snub his nose to say, 'one man operation, bahh, how little you know peon.'

that is incredulous
  #215  
Old 04-10-2006, 11:25 PM
leehrat leehrat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,706
Default Re: Reduce the rake is SCUM

[ QUOTE ]
i am flabergasted. the one response he makes in weeks is to defend his pride and snub his nose to say, 'one man operation, bahh, how little you know peon.'

that is incredulous

[/ QUOTE ]

you'd be cocky too if you could summon a goblin to kill all of your naysayers
  #216  
Old 04-10-2006, 11:29 PM
morgant morgant is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,948
Default Re: Reduce the rake is SCUM

i tried to read that, but it was greek. cliff notes?
  #217  
Old 04-10-2006, 11:34 PM
Aukai Aukai is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: NOLA
Posts: 275
Default Re: Reduce the rake is SCUM

I have no idea what any of this means, but I think it's hilarious. One excerpt:

"Game 2: Flores played a Seat of Synod on his first turn, which Smerling Detonated. Flores sat on one land and a couple of Spellbombs while Smerling had a Goblin Piledriver and a morph with no gas in his grip.

Lester decided to imprint a Mox with Threaten, lay a second Piledriver, and then Threaten his own Piledriver to attack for eighty. Unfortunately for him, Flores was able to cast double Frogmite the following turn and therefore negate the two Piledrivers... And that's exactly what the Frogmites did when Lester all-in attacked and the morph got in for two on Smerling's next attack phase. "

Damn that crafty all-in attack...
  #218  
Old 04-10-2006, 11:36 PM
SackUp SackUp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Undefeated as a Lawyer!
Posts: 6,580
Default Re: Reduce the rake is SCUM

[ QUOTE ]
i doubt there is much u can do in the courts. They dont like dealing with gambling things.

But, he is still a huge scumbag.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is a contract case, not a poker case.
  #219  
Old 04-10-2006, 11:37 PM
siccjay siccjay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Aqua Man That Hoe!
Posts: 6,717
Default Re: Reduce the rake is SCUM

[ QUOTE ]
i am flabergasted. the one response he makes in weeks is to defend his pride and snub his nose to say, 'one man operation, bahh, how little you know peon.'

that is incredulous

[/ QUOTE ]

This is exactly how I felt reading it.
  #220  
Old 04-10-2006, 11:38 PM
Will. Will. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: weboggle
Posts: 2,177
Default Re: Reduce the rake is SCUM

[ QUOTE ]
I have no idea what any of this means, but I think it's hilarious. One excerpt:

"Game 2: Flores played a Seat of Synod on his first turn, which Smerling Detonated. Flores sat on one land and a couple of Spellbombs while Smerling had a Goblin Piledriver and a morph with no gas in his grip.

Lester decided to imprint a Mox with Threaten, lay a second Piledriver, and then Threaten his own Piledriver to attack for eighty. Unfortunately for him, Flores was able to cast double Frogmite the following turn and therefore negate the two Piledrivers... And that's exactly what the Frogmites did when Lester all-in attacked and the morph got in for two on Smerling's next attack phase. "

Damn that crafty all-in attack...

[/ QUOTE ]LOL, he plays magic the gathering...
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.