|
|
#11
04-11-2006, 09:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WSOP Main Event: 2+2 Takes Over the World
[ QUOTE ]
We would need to define "2+2er". [/ QUOTE ] I think madcaller overestimates the MTT skill of the average 2+2er 
|
|
#13
04-12-2006, 04:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: WSOP Main Event: 2+2 Takes Over the World
[ QUOTE ]
yes, an impossible task if there ever was one [/ QUOTE ] If you're really trying to set a fair line, just come up with some set criteria like "25 or more posts before the start date of the main event". Problem solved.
|
|
#14
04-12-2006, 05:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I\'ll take the over for the $100
The man posted a fair proposition bet. He wants the under and is looking for someone to take the over, with the number at 1.
Quit waxing your sophistical carrots, this is not that tough to understand. zizazziza, you're on ... I'll take the over for $100. Anyone else have any proposition bets for the WSOP ? Truepoker CEO
|
|
#15
04-12-2006, 05:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What problem ?? Let\'s see some more prop bets
"They ran into the same problem" on Gutshot .....
What problem ? ziz set his odds at 2:1 and offered a proposition for $100. I took the bet .... is there something mysterious here I am missing ? The market sets the odds. Let's see some more prop bets. Truepoker CEO
|
|
#16
04-12-2006, 05:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I\'ll take the over for the $100
[ QUOTE ]
The man posted a fair proposition bet. He wants the under and is looking for someone to take the over, with the number at 1. Quit waxing your sophistical carrots, this is not that tough to understand. zizazziza, you're on ... I'll take the over for $100. Anyone else have any proposition bets for the WSOP ? Truepoker CEO [/ QUOTE ] Truepoker CEO, I love all of your post. It makes you seem like a really cool CEO (ie. making $100 bets on 2+2 and the TruePoker condom promotion). I amagine that you would be a fun CEO to work for. With that being said I only wish I liked your site more so that I could give you some of my rake.
|
|
#17
04-12-2006, 06:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What problem ?? Let\'s see some more prop bets
[ QUOTE ]
"They ran into the same problem" on Gutshot ..... What problem ? ziz set his odds at 2:1 and offered a proposition for $100. I took the bet .... is there something mysterious here I am missing ? The market sets the odds. Let's see some more prop bets. Truepoker CEO [/ QUOTE ] Define "2+2er". Todd Brunson? Huck Seed? Scott Fischman? There are three that come to mind who have made a few posts here recently. It's obviously not clearcut.
|
|
#18
04-12-2006, 08:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What problem ?? Let\'s see some more prop bets
Negreneau and Greenstein have also posted here before and I don't believe either one would consider themselves a 2+2'er.
Annie Duke posted here way back when. Paul Phillips posted here, got mad at the 2+2 guys, and left. But when he was here he posted semi-frequently. Alan Goehring and Andy Bloch made posts here as well. None of the above are really active 2+2'ers. But they have actually BEEN here before. Indeed, defining who counts as a 2+2'er and who doesn't needs to be established before you go off making any bets like this. If any of these people made the final-table would they count or not?
|
|
#19
04-12-2006, 10:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: WSOP Main Event: 2+2 Takes Over the World
[ QUOTE ]
200+ posts [/ QUOTE ] this excludes blair rodman and todd brunson
|
|
#20
04-13-2006, 03:15 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What problem ?? Let\'s see some more prop bets
Over 1 (+200) seems like a bad bet. I would have asked for over 0.5 (+200), which would be vastly superior.
What percentage of the field do you think is going to be 2+2ers? Have you even established criteria for what constitutes a 2+2er?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
