reraised Aces on nasty board (NL400-6max)

[technologic]

[ QUOTE ]
A quick weakness check isnt really going to induce any bluff. If he's got the A or flush, he'll fire, if not, he'll check.

[/ QUOTE ]

um, so we can expect a call from two pair/ set? HIGHLY unlikely. i'd say going for a snapped off bluff is much more profitable.

[Big_Jim]

Pot flop, push turn.

If he has AK or QQ (particularly with [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] it's gonna be real tough for him to know what to do.

As played, bet river, he checks behind too often with two pair/sets.

[Lucky]

Couple more things:

1. Raise more pf, just like you would trying to take it down with AQ.

2. I like turn check. This is tough spot. With no diamond I bet and am done with it if i get raised. With a diamond, I like a check, as I dont want to get raised out.

3. The big question, i think is whether to c/r all in on turn???

I think i like a c/r here because: you're very possibly ahead, and will get paid for flush by KxQd. He may fold better hand like JT. On the other hand he may call with AK.
Also, it makes for no tough river spots, i.e. you c/c turn and blank river. He value bets 100. You call and are beaten. Or its checked thru and you were ahead.

[Lucky]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
A quick weakness check isnt really going to induce any bluff. If he's got the A or flush, he'll fire, if not, he'll check.

[/ QUOTE ]

um, so we can expect a call from two pair/ set? HIGHLY unlikely. i'd say going for a snapped off bluff is much more profitable.

[/ QUOTE ]

He's not going to bet this board when heros betting pattern screams Ace. He's more likely to call 100 with top two getting 4 to 1, even though he knows he shouldnt.