![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have Axel over a 200k sample as a 3ptBB winner. He's probably not good enough to do much better than that, in my opinion.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would call this because I think I will win atleast 1 out of 3 times, though he prob river you with better 2 pr?? Would be easier to decide if you had a larger hand sample on him and knew better his street by street aggression frequencies.
As I have said many times before, I am not very good at making laydowns in somewhat close spots. Intuitavly, it would seem like he rivered a pretty good hand or was slowplaying because he can not really expect you to fold when you bet the first two streets (meaning it is unlikely he is on a bluff, and also there are not really obvious draws that missed that he was bluffing ..... so maybe this is a fold). I don't think it is huge plusEV to call, I place value on learning so I call when I think it is pretty close .... |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
oh yeah, would be nice if you converted, easier to see pot size on each street and you will probably get better quality responses and more responses .... here is link to a converter:
http://www.leggopoker.com/index.php?page=hh |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
jo my mistake now its converted
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
oops, when I said call I didn't notice flush draw hit on river sorry ....
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Can't figure out his hand, river really doesn't improve him (unless he has 89ss?) and slowplaying a big hand that much on that flop/turn doesn't make much sense...
I'd just put him on 57 or 8s9s and call 88+ I think. Actually I'm just looking at his stats, if he's bad I'd let it go here. Ok in that case I fold. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
32 is his wts and i had aout 80 hands from him.
and he can have a flush on river given his 32 wts he can probably call 2times not hving the right odds |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
i would bet more on the flop and i think the river is a pretty easy fold for sure
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
bet more on flop, fold river
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
snap fold river
|
![]() |
|
|