Updated Cliff Notes On Absolute Poker Scandal (18th October)

[Jehaim]

[ QUOTE ]
Sounds like they haven't made up their mind yet about what they're going to admit or deny.

They're probably still looking for a cover-up story that allows them to deny the most damning facts like the superuser account, especially because the proof for this is too complicated for the general public to be understood as a smoking gun. When we start talking about hand histories, river aggression factor, IP addresses and DNS servers, nobody cares anymore.

[/ QUOTE ]

The general public here in the Netherlands all believe it in a second, because they (in general) suck at poker and LOVE the fact that they lose their money because they're being cheated.

Although they dont play above $10 MTT or $0.25 NL by the way.

[apefish]

edited out because someone has posted it.

I will point out that someone with email from that name was observing Potripper's win.

So I think even having a screen name that is similar and a record at UB is significant.

[cpitt398]

[ QUOTE ]
People who have never cashed suddenly win tourneys playing maniacal.


That's about as clear as I can make that connection.

[/ QUOTE ]

its not even the same person

plus that how it really works anyways, lol

[Synergistic Explosions]

[ QUOTE ]
MARK SEIF: yes i was watching the hands on a player
MARK SEIF: i actually saw quite a few hands that suggest he couldnt see
MARK SEIF: the hands - he played very poorly if he could see them

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm speechless by these comments.

[NoMeansYes_]

Good work guys.

[apefish]

Before that goes too far- I'm not at all positive the context of those statements.
Mark could have been saying that in reference to the youtube or pokerxfactor broadcasts right?

Edited to reflect that as I read that chat I'm pretty sure that IS the context of Mark saying that. He's watched the replays.

Heads may asplode now- just make sure of the reasons.

[N 82 50 24]

[ QUOTE ]
I will point out that someone with email from that name was observing Potripper's win.

So I think even having a screen name that is similar and a record at UB is significant.

[/ QUOTE ]
That is why I think it's significant. potchopper is very close to POTRIPPER. And since potchopper is Scott Tom on UB, that's more circumstantial evidence that connects POTRIPPER to Scott Tom.

[aaronbeen]

[ QUOTE ]
Before that goes too far- I'm not at all positive the context of those statements.
Mark could have been saying that in reference to the youtube or pokerxfactor broadcasts right?

[/ QUOTE ]

that's right someone asked him if he watched the replay and he responded

[DonkeyKing]

Anyone know AP's business entity name on the stock market? I'd like to look at their stock history over the recent month.

[ClubChamp04]

[ QUOTE ]
Sounds like they haven't made up their mind yet about what they're going to admit or deny.

They're probably still looking for a cover-up story that allows them to deny the most damning facts like the superuser account, especially because the proof for this is too complicated for the general public to be understood as a smoking gun. When we start talking about hand histories, river aggression factor, IP addresses and DNS servers, nobody cares anymore.

[/ QUOTE ]

Exactly. They won't give DD ANY details about the ongoing investigation b/c they want to spin something up that is airtight.