|
|
#13
10-03-2007, 04:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $60, really slim bubble push...?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I haven't played sngs in a long time, but this was an any two cards push when I played. [/ QUOTE ] It still is. [/ QUOTE ] zomg. Tigerite...good to see you back around. 
|
|
#14
10-03-2007, 05:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $60, really slim bubble push...?
[ QUOTE ]
Incredibly read dependent. I mean BB shouldn't call with like AK and stuff but most people still do. [/ QUOTE ] I think this is absolutely right, great shove against some people godawful against others.
|
|
#16
10-03-2007, 06:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $60, really slim bubble push...?
I would have thought this is a standard ATC spot. It's like +0.6%EV when the blinds call "correctly" on 99+ compared to -0.2%EV if they both call AQ+/77+.
Not to mention how ICM undervalues your equity when you lose vs BB and have 55 chips left since the blind hits UTG next hand.
|
|
#17
10-03-2007, 07:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $60, really slim bubble push...?
[ QUOTE ]
In perfect world it would be a +ev push, in real its -ev [/ QUOTE ] True, you cannot own donks. I think as the buyin increases, the EV of this push increases, the same goes for the 'regularity' or 'solidarity' of the blinds
|
|
#19
10-03-2007, 08:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $60, really slim bubble push...?
seems alright, the third big stack calling wouldnt be that big of a desestar here.
|
|
#20
10-03-2007, 03:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $60, really slim bubble push...?
[ QUOTE ]
In perfect world it would be a +ev push, in real its -ev [/ QUOTE ] I guess you were given better reads than me? Or you were at the table? Can you please explain why this is definitely a -EV push? If the blinds are both competent, then it seems like a standard push to me, let alone -EV.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
