|
|
#12
09-30-2007, 09:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Lodden\'s laydown
[ QUOTE ]
What are we looking at here? Why exactly did he lay down a flush? Only quad 3's could have beaten him, no? [/ QUOTE ] No, the board was 3s 6s 8c 3c Ks and Loden had Js 7s. Therefore he would lose to 2 spades that included a Queen or an Ace as well as these hands: K3, 83, 63, KK, 88, 66 and 33. If he was against a weaker flush or AK then it was a bad laydown, but in this case he was against 8h 8s for a full house so he was laying down the losing hand. 
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
