Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 09-06-2007, 12:48 AM
Lego05 Lego05 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,477
Default Re: 50NL; AA vs. known 2+2\'er

GtrHtr, that's fine. But if I bet or check/raise flop what do we expect to happen? I expect he folds everything except sets (I don't think AQ or the like is in his range). I took this line specifically because of the fact that he can 2 and 3 barrel me. I saw it as the only way to really get value from a worse hand than mine. You disagree I guess???


BTW what is "ffs".
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-06-2007, 12:51 AM
mookboi mookboi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Fitty NL
Posts: 814
Default Re: 50NL; AA vs. known 2+2\'er

CR flop to 12, if he pushes, fold.
ffs = for [censored]'s sake.

As played, fold river.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-06-2007, 12:56 AM
Sykes Sykes is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chasing donks
Posts: 4,336
Default Re: 50NL; AA vs. known 2+2\'er

ffs = for [censored]'s sake

bet the flop plz [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img].
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-06-2007, 12:56 AM
Lego05 Lego05 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,477
Default Re: 50NL; AA vs. known 2+2\'er

[ QUOTE ]
CR flop to 12, if he pushes, fold.
ffs = for [censored]'s sake.

As played, fold river.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thanks.

But about the hand that's exactly what I was trying to change. Instead of betting and folding to a raise or check raising and shoving to a fold I was trying to find a line that could get more value from a good regular TAG (whose range has gotta be nearly only pocket pairs) with AA on a dry board.

Your suggestion to check raise flop and then fold to a push is a suggestion to make my AA a bluff. You may as well tell me to do this with JTs.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-06-2007, 01:23 AM
Hail Eris Hail Eris is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 663
Default Re: 50NL; AA vs. known 2+2\'er

[ QUOTE ]
Your suggestion to check raise flop and then fold to a push is a suggestion to make my AA a bluff. You may as well tell me to do this with JTs.

[/ QUOTE ]

If C/R this flop with AA turns it into a bluff, you need to be C/R this flop more often. Not as the PFR though.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-06-2007, 01:31 AM
Hail Eris Hail Eris is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 663
Default Re: 50NL; AA vs. known 2+2\'er

Anyway, the answer to your dilemma is that if he's aggro enough to triple barrel unimproved pps here, or whatever you're trying to get him to do, he's also aggro enough to float and bluff/raise and so on and so forth. It's ridiculous to think he's always folding 33 unimproved to a cbet on this flop, but firing 2 barrels when checked to.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-06-2007, 01:47 AM
Don Key E37 Don Key E37 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: bluff pushing into the nuts
Posts: 724
Default Re: 50NL; AA vs. known 2+2\'er

I think your getting a bit to tricky for 50nl. You really shouldn't be folding aces to often unless the action or board is real real ugly. He's not limping kk or qq pre probably not kq and 88 isn't all that likely, but really just lead flop first off. I can't think of a reason not to so the rest of it has me confused a bit but yeah sorry he had 44/55 but the way you played it you can't get away, and you really shouldn't be looking to much anyway. There are a lot more spots you should probably be looking to fix before you worry about folding aces on this board on the flop at 50nl.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-06-2007, 02:13 AM
Brian O'Nolan Brian O'Nolan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 484
Default Re: 50NL; AA vs. known 2+2\'er

If villain is as tricky/optimal with bluff freq as you seem to think folding aces to him here is awful. I doubt he is triple barreling or w/e anywhere near as often as you imply.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-06-2007, 12:29 PM
Lego05 Lego05 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,477
Default Re: 50NL; AA vs. known 2+2\'er

Bump for morning.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-06-2007, 12:56 PM
BevillTheDevil BevillTheDevil is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,342
Default Re: 50NL; AA vs. known 2+2\'er

id bet or raise somewhere in this hand. We have played it so passively that we have absolutely no idea where we are stand. That doesnt mean im necessarly bettin for info (though that is a plus). But playin this so weak puts us in tough spots esp against aggro opponents. Stat wise this guy seems decent so If you think he is capable of sencing weakness or plays this aggro w/ TP hands then i call the river. TBH i dont what is best on the river tho cause i never take this flop/turn line.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.