NFL 6pt 2 teamers

[kaboshedx]

[ QUOTE ]

Some of these could still be +EV. A lot of the lines where you tease OFF the key numbers are still +EV, while the ones where you tease ONTO a key number are not (or at least less EV than betting on the spread.)

[/ QUOTE ]

If I'm not mistaken teasing off or on to a key number is not a true Wong, the tease has to go accross a key number.

What I'm trying to get at is - when judging whether a spread is wongable or not does one need to use the "true line" to juge. Or, is it as black and white as just moving the number that a book has posted regardless of what another book has the -110 line set at?

[rjp]

I think what 5Dimes does is they typically offer adjusted prices when you select which team to bet. Well, if the team is close to a key number the "main" spread is actually the adjusted spread, such that when you go to tease the game you get a bad number.

For example, the Titans were -7 this week, yet 5Dimes had the main spread at an adjust -8 so when you went to tease the game their system used -8 instead of -7.

[Artdogg]

[ QUOTE ]
I think what 5Dimes does is they typically offer adjusted prices when you select which team to bet. Well, if the team is close to a key number the "main" spread is actually the adjusted spread, such that when you go to tease the game you get a bad number.

For example, the Titans were -7 this week, yet 5Dimes had the main spread at an adjust -8 so when you went to tease the game their system used -8 instead of -7.

[/ QUOTE ]

aka they [censored] with the lines

[ImNew]

It depends, I think.

For favourites, I choose teams base on moneyline rather than the spread. For dogs, I look at what price I'm getting at +2.5 on side. Also, I take line movement into consideration.