![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
1) When you [censored] them, it is good.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Seriously: Smoker, Tramp Stamp, Nurse, in the 95-110 lb range.
Sadly: No clear father figure ever in her life. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Sadly: No clear father figure ever in her life. [/ QUOTE ] Couldn't agree more with this one. A less-than-stellar childhood is usually a good sign for a one-nighter. Girls that have lived in multiple cities growing up are much better in bed than girls who have always lived in the same house. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Given the wide net this thread is casting, wouldn't it be easiser to do this thread the other way around?
Fact: that thread would actually suck too |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Sadly: No clear father figure ever in her life. [/ QUOTE ] Couldn't agree more with this one. A less-than-stellar childhood is usually a good sign for a one-nighter. [/ QUOTE ] I only dated girls from broken homes in high school (they just want to be loved, and have twice as many places to sex them up when my parents were home) does that make me a bad person? |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
You can tell by looking at their eyes, if you bother. [ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] He's right, she has beautiful eyes... |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
without reading all of this, is it safe to assume that every girl could be good or not good in bed based on all the different statements made?
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
arched back = HAWT IN BED
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Herpes
|
![]() |
|
|