|
|
#12
07-24-2007, 07:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KQs vs. LAG
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I don't think villain is folding an A here so I just check and see what he does. [/ QUOTE ] i agree that c/c is better against this guy in general, but shouldn't we double barrel sometimes so as not to encourage him to float us? [/ QUOTE ] If you c/c is it with the intention of trying to take it away on the river? Does anyone like a c/r all in line? [/ QUOTE ] If villian bets turn he's calling a shove. 
|
|
#13
07-24-2007, 07:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KQs vs. LAG
I like a crai in this type of situation with this type of player.
|
|
#14
07-24-2007, 07:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KQs vs. LAG
This is a tough situation, but I probably bet the turn again since you have bet the flop against him before and then c/f on the turn.
|
|
#16
07-24-2007, 07:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KQs vs. LAG
[ QUOTE ]
If villian bets turn he's calling a shove. [/ QUOTE ] OP's description is that villain is VERY active and has been calling OP's cbets then bets when OP checks to him on turn. if villain folds to 2nd barrel he doesn't have an ace. If he does he's calling you. Given his aggressive nature, why not get another bet from him then on this turn on the times when he bets without an ace?
|
|
#17
07-24-2007, 07:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KQs vs. LAG
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] If villian bets turn he's calling a shove. [/ QUOTE ] OP's description is that villain is VERY active and has been calling OP's cbets then bets when OP checks to him on turn. if villain folds to 2nd barrel he doesn't have an ace. If he does he's calling you. Given his aggressive nature, why not get another bet from him then on this turn on the times when he bets without an ace? [/ QUOTE ] c/ring turn is really bad. We're pricing him in to call even if he has something like pocket 9s and we have king high.
|
|
#18
07-24-2007, 07:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KQs vs. LAG
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] If villian bets turn he's calling a shove. [/ QUOTE ] OP's description is that villain is VERY active and has been calling OP's cbets then bets when OP checks to him on turn. if villain folds to 2nd barrel he doesn't have an ace. If he does he's calling you. Given his aggressive nature, why not get another bet from him then on this turn on the times when he bets without an ace? [/ QUOTE ] I think that if we CRAI and he has an A there's no chance of him folding that but if we double barrell there's more of a chance that he folds an A. But I think we have to weigh when he has an A to when he has some FD or a PP.
|
|
#19
07-24-2007, 07:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KQs vs. LAG
yeah, if we c/r ai he basically has to call.
|
|
#20
07-24-2007, 07:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KQs vs. LAG
[/ QUOTE ] c/ring turn is really bad. We're pricing him in to call even if he has something like pocket 9s and we have king high. [/ QUOTE ] yeah if he knew our cards...but if you're villain you call with 99 because you're priced in? sorry if i'm misunderstanding you. i'm not saying i'm doing this every time but you should mix it up now and then with your turn crai's. so you do it w/ your monsters and you do it against aggros as a semibluff. not just to fold their cards but to get paid another bet as well while doing it.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
