Nothing ... adds ... up

[ronitonline]

I do agree that it could be 22 Imarhil, but is 22 really cbetting that flop? Especially if he is nittish? I would expect a nit to just play set value out of small pairs like that.
Dunno tho.

[NL Newbie]

alot of PP's will fire at this flop when checked to IMO, but they won't raise the river unless they improved to a set.

[aislephive]

FWIW, my image is taggy although a bit on the laggier side, 24/18 - 26/20.

[Imrahil]

[ QUOTE ]
I do agree that it could be 22 Imarhil, but is 22 really cbetting that flop? Especially if he is nittish? I would expect a nit to just play set value out of small pairs like that.
Dunno tho.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think a lot of players take stabs with PPs when checked to on the flop by the PFR.

[74o_Clownsuit]

[ QUOTE ]
FWIW, my image is taggy although a bit on the laggier side, 24/18 - 26/20.

[/ QUOTE ]
Then I don't mind the call but it's very marginal imo.

[All_Inn_Aces]

[ QUOTE ]
Nits kinda play some hands strange. I call out of confusion...

[/ QUOTE ]
If I had a dime for every dime I lost calling out of sheer WTF-osity, I wouldnt need rakeback or a part-time job

[ronitonline]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I do agree that it could be 22 Imarhil, but is 22 really cbetting that flop? Especially if he is nittish? I would expect a nit to just play set value out of small pairs like that.
Dunno tho.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think a lot of players take stabs with PPs when checked to on the flop by the PFR.

[/ QUOTE ]

Wouldnt a NIT be more likely to bet 22 in position when HE was the PFR?
Not Hero being PFR raiser?

[Zaid_Ahmed]

222.
fold and give up

[orange]

your hand looks like KK. call river.

[benlj21]

you played this hand really strange. 22 makes sense, and I could see some people checking behind with the nuts on the turn. That said, the fact that you played this hand so wierd means I think you have to call river, your hand is way way underrepresented.