|
|
#11
02-13-2007, 06:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $22 MTT Pokerstars
[ QUOTE ]
Your fear of being outdrawn argument would hold water if the flop was A 9T but not on an A94r board. What can possibly outdraw a set on this board? You made a good call. [/ QUOTE ] Eh, maybe it's weak-tight on my part, but in this situation when a big stack risks almost all his chips against another big stack, after his opponent has shown strength by raising pf and then betting the flop - he's usually got more than 1 pair. 
|
|
#12
02-13-2007, 06:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $22 MTT Pokerstars
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Your fear of being outdrawn argument would hold water if the flop was A 9T but not on an A94r board. What can possibly outdraw a set on this board? You made a good call. [/ QUOTE ] Eh, maybe it's weak-tight on my part, but in this situation when a big stack risks almost all his chips against another big stack, after his opponent has shown strength by raising pf and then betting the flop - he's usually got more than 1 pair. [/ QUOTE ] I agree, and its not weaktight to think so. I mean in holdem profits come from being able to draw conclutions from your opponents behaivior and make the corrects play from that information; How likely is he to have a hand we beat? Is he likely to either be effected by your loose image and decide to go with A-weaker kicker, or do it because he cant muck an ace. Or any other reason to be unusually bold for all his chips? Or does he just have a great hand and decides to get it allin in when he knows he is ahead. Im serious about this being weaktight and common. I mean why do so many people fail to valuebet the river when they dont have the nuts. Now we know the result but I believe I would have said this anyway; he is afraid of you and will feel scared if any card commes which makes a better hand possible.
|
|
#13
02-13-2007, 07:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $22 MTT Pokerstars
Since all these posters here are saying call, there's only one thing to do. I gotta play in this tourney.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
