Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Medium Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 01-17-2007, 02:30 PM
The DaveR The DaveR is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: IMA CUT U, WTF CANADA
Posts: 16,743
Default Re: 30/60 @ Wynn

WTF happened to everyone here? The river is a very straightfoward bet/call. Aggros think everyone is FOS and he will bluffraise the river enough to make bet/call easily the best option.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-17-2007, 02:31 PM
private joker private joker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: north american scum
Posts: 11,413
Default Re: 30/60 @ Wynn

If hero's image is somewhat decent, DaveR, I think checking to induce a bluff is a fine play on the river. Bet/call isn't bad either, but I don't mind the check-call.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-17-2007, 02:34 PM
The DaveR The DaveR is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: IMA CUT U, WTF CANADA
Posts: 16,743
Default Re: 30/60 @ Wynn

[ QUOTE ]
If hero's image is somewhat decent, DaveR, I think checking to induce a bluff is a fine play on the river. Bet/call isn't bad either, but I don't mind the check-call.

[/ QUOTE ]

Bet/call is better for the reasons I said. You haven't answered them. I also left unsaid the small advantage to value betting him thinly and fearlessly and forcing him to think about the fact that you are adjusting properly to him when he raises light. There are some river cards where check/call is best; this isn't one of them.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-17-2007, 02:42 PM
Bicycles_Biatch Bicycles_Biatch is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Paying Attention
Posts: 2,657
Default Re: 30/60 @ Wynn

[ QUOTE ]
If hero's image is somewhat decent, DaveR, I think checking to induce a bluff is a fine play on the river. Bet/call isn't bad either, but I don't mind the check-call.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think I had a good image... only played two hands and came in for a raise on both of them over the last 45 minutes (AK and 10-10)...

was defending my blinds about 50-60% of the time.

My though process was that when the king fell on the river there were 3 options:

1) bet, I get raised if he spiked a King and had been playing all the way with overs

2) bet, he folds if he has something like A-10 or 33

3) check/call- my original line... may induce a bluff and/or save me one bet for those times when he did spike a king.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-17-2007, 02:52 PM
jba jba is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,596
Default Re: 30/60 @ Wynn

[ QUOTE ]
If hero's image is somewhat decent, DaveR, I think checking to induce a bluff

[/ QUOTE ]

the problem is that his range has very few hands with no showdown value, so he lacks motive to bluff. if he's a aggro donkey fine, but he's checking behind hoping AQ is good a lot.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-17-2007, 03:04 PM
blindside blindside is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 337
Default Re: 30/60 @ Wynn

bet the river... he can most likely call down light here.... i'm pretty sure he's not folding something like 33 if he calls the turn with it or something like T7 and you give him an opportunity to check behind with those hands... and no chance in hell he checks a better hand than J9...

though seeing the results may have influenced my opinion...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.