|
|
#11
09-29-2006, 05:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Worst Poker Book You\'ve Ever Seen/Read?
I'm very sorry for having an opinion, I will henceforth completely agree with you because if I didn't like a book that you seem to, that clearly makes me a losing poker player.
|
|
#12
09-29-2006, 06:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Worst Poker Book You\'ve Ever Seen/Read?
Your opinion is null because you are basing it on the assumption that ALL POKER BOOKS HAVE TO BE ABOUT STATEGY ONLY BECAUSE "loveminus0) says so
|
|
#13
09-29-2006, 06:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Worst Poker Book You\'ve Ever Seen/Read?
No, I am saying that I disliked Bad Beats and Lucky Draws because it provided poor insight into the hands featured, was full of Phil Hellmuth talking about how good he was which I don't really care to read about, was poorly written, and on and on.
|
|
#15
09-29-2006, 08:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Worst Poker Book You\'ve Ever Seen/Read?
poker unlimited.
|
|
#16
09-29-2006, 09:37 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Worst Poker Book You\'ve Ever Seen/Read?
Once again your looking for insight and strategy.
This book was for entertainment. You say it was poorly written. Can I have some examples Do you have an editing background. Do you work for a publisher. What are your qualifications to say that the book was poorly written. That said I think it was a Well written, Entertainment filled book with little or no strategy value. Same argument I can't say it was Well Written because I don't have any TRUE idea of what a well written book should be like all i can base it on is that I enjoyed the book. You did not like the book hence it's poorly written. I don't think you can base the writing of a book based on whether you liked it or not. We could ask someone with a masters in english ?
|
|
#17
09-29-2006, 09:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Worst Poker Book You\'ve Ever Seen/Read?
[ QUOTE ]
Once again your looking for insight and strategy. This book was for entertainment. You say it was poorly written. Can I have some examples Do you have an editing background. Do you work for a publisher. What are your qualifications to say that the book was poorly written. That said I think it was a Well written, Entertainment filled book with little or no strategy value. Same argument I can't say it was Well Written because I don't have any TRUE idea of what a well written book should be like all i can base it on is that I enjoyed the book. You did not like the book hence it's poorly written. I don't think you can base the writing of a book based on whether you liked it or not. We could ask someone with a masters in english ? [/ QUOTE ] What is your relationship to the author, publisher, etc.?
|
|
#18
09-29-2006, 10:06 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Worst Poker Book You\'ve Ever Seen/Read?
Exactly what I was thinking, steamboatin. This guy seems genuinely offended that I did not like the book.
|
|
#20
09-29-2006, 10:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Worst Poker Book You\'ve Ever Seen/Read?
[ QUOTE ]
Once again your looking for insight and strategy. This book was for entertainment. You say it was poorly written. Can I have some examples Do you have an editing background. Do you work for a publisher. What are your qualifications to say that the book was poorly written. That said I think it was a Well written, Entertainment filled book with little or no strategy value. Same argument I can't say it was Well Written because I don't have any TRUE idea of what a well written book should be like all i can base it on is that I enjoyed the book. You did not like the book hence it's poorly written. I don't think you can base the writing of a book based on whether you liked it or not. We could ask someone with a masters in english ? [/ QUOTE ] Phil?!?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
