![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Maybe I've misunderstood something, but I used a 95% confidence interval to calculate that: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confidence_interval
<p - z sqrt(p(1-p)/n), p + z sqrt(p(1-p)/n)> = <.19 - 1.96 sqrt(.19(1-.19)/150), .19 + 1.96 sqrt(.19(1-.19)/150)> = <.13, .25> Don't you think he's got any idea wether he's a winning player when he's played 150 SnGs with a ROI of 19%? |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well I have no idea what that crazy math means, but I can say that I'm a winning player and I can easily go over 150 sngs with a negative roi or a ridiculously inflated one.
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
150 SNG's mostly $33's and $55's and my ITM is 46%, ROI 19%... How good or bad are those numbers for these levels? Is 150 really enough to give me an idea of where I stand ? Thanks in advance. [/ QUOTE ] 19% ROI is terrible for $55s. I would quit now and get a job at McDonald's if possible. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Lock this beautiful thread.
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
If you are ITM 46% and your ROI is only 19% something is seriously wrong with your 3 and 4 handed play.
|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jesus Christ, people. Stop commenting on a 150 sng sample.
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
If you are ITM 46% and your ROI is only 19% something is seriously wrong with your 3 and 4 handed play. [/ QUOTE ] My ROI is -3% and ITM 49% over my last 750 $55s. Should I be concerned? |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Jesus Christ, people. Stop commenting on a 150 sng sample. [/ QUOTE ] Just for future reference, at what sample is it OK to comment? |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Well I have no idea what that crazy math means, but I can say that I'm a winning player and I can easily go over 150 sngs with a negative roi or a ridiculously inflated one. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, but if you split up all your SnGs in 150-SnGs-chunks, 95% of the chuncks' ROI should be between 13% and 25% if your true ROI is 19%. If you've played thousands of SnGs, of course many of the chuncks will have a ROI that is below or above that confidence interval. |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Jesus Christ, people. Stop commenting on a 150 sng sample. [/ QUOTE ] It's worse than that, because he doesn't have a sample size of 150. The OP said that he was playing mostly 33s and 55s. So what he has here is maybe 3 to 5 much smaller samples of different games, all lumped together and treated as if they were all the same thing. |
![]() |
|
|