Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Poker > Stud
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 01-17-2006, 07:17 PM
MikeBandy MikeBandy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 114
Default Re: Kings vs paired door card

How can you fold on fifth street? You could get J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] and make a straight flush. All right, let’s get back to reality, now.

You didn’t say the players were loose, you said they were very loose; so I suppose trip threes are a possibility. If that’s what the player has, you’re in trouble. However, folding your hand because of this possibility would be a weak play.

Aces up or jacks up seem like a more probable holding. Folding because of the possibility of aces up would also be weak. After all, you’ve seen another ace, and your opponent’s betting pattern doesn’t indicate that he or she has aces in the hole.

You have to think you’re in trouble when you see the bet on the river. However, I’m very confident that, considering the size of the pot, kings up is a good enough hand to warrant a call.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-17-2006, 10:34 PM
MichaelOar MichaelOar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 300
Default Re: Kings vs paired door card

Jon,

I hate calling here. Assuming the bettor doesn't have trips, you are GREATLY increasing your chances of winning the pot if you raise here. If he does have trips, you're likely going to get 3-bet, so you at least know where the heck you're at (I don't think most players are tricky enough to 3-bet here without trips, and I think that even 2pr isn't likely to 3-bet here). By calling, you're letting the whole field stay in cheaply with their flukely draws. I also wonder what your plan is for the rest of the hand? Call all the way down unimproved? Fold 7th without 2pr? That can't be right.

I thought raising was the best, followed closely by a fold. I think calling is terrible here---and I'm pretty damned weak!

Michael
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-17-2006, 11:35 PM
jon_1van jon_1van is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: buy them in bulk
Posts: 2,263
Default Re: Kings vs paired door card

[ QUOTE ]
Jon,

I hate calling here. Assuming the bettor doesn't have trips, you are GREATLY increasing your chances of winning the pot if you raise here. If he does have trips, you're likely going to get 3-bet, so you at least know where the heck you're at (I don't think most players are tricky enough to 3-bet here without trips, and I think that even 2pr isn't likely to 3-bet here). By calling, you're letting the whole field stay in cheaply with their flukely draws. I also wonder what your plan is for the rest of the hand? Call all the way down unimproved? Fold 7th without 2pr? That can't be right.

I thought raising was the best, followed closely by a fold. I think calling is terrible here---and I'm pretty damned weak!

Michael

[/ QUOTE ]

1. Which street is "here"

2. (Every thing regarding 5th street)
Do you realize that raising might not even clear the field?
Do you realize that you are very likely behind here?
Do you realize that you'll make your straight about 1 in 7 times?
Do you realize that you're hand is vunerable to a redraw?
Do you realize that no other 3 is showing?
Do you realize Ks up isn't nearly "a lock" in 5 way action?
Do you realize a solid draw facing 2-bets cold can't make a big mistake by calling or folding?
Do you realize raising forces a slim draw to correctly fold?


Do you have a plan for when you "know" seat 2 has trips?


I HATE raising 5th. There are times when a good hand doesn't get help, and a weak hand does. When this happens, espically in multiway action, just fold because Ks up won't be very strong in a showdown. There is no point chasing for a medium strength showdown hand when there are 4 other opponents. In this example, there is only 1 scary board, and our hero has more hope than just Ks up, so itsn't as bad as it could be, but hacking your way through the field with a bowie knife just to get shot in the head at showdown doesn't make any sense.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-18-2006, 02:13 AM
MichaelOar MichaelOar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 300
Default Re: Kings vs paired door card

So what do you want to do? You said early it's close between folding and calling. I think it's close between folding and raising, with calling not even being a contender. I can't think of a single good reason to just call here.

Michael
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-18-2006, 07:57 AM
jon_1van jon_1van is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: buy them in bulk
Posts: 2,263
Default Re: Kings vs paired door card

[ QUOTE ]
So what do you want to do? You said early it's close between folding and calling. I think it's close between folding and raising, with calling not even being a contender. I can't think of a single good reason to just call here.

Michael

[/ QUOTE ]

I really have no strong preference btw folding and calling. I think folding is slightly better. But I'd probably call in the heat of the moment because I'm a sucker for action.

I think we'll just have to agree to disagree here. I understand your desire to raise. I used to play alot of 3-6 where multiway pots are a bit more common than 5-10. And I used to raise frequently, it very rarely worked, and it was very expensive.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-18-2006, 09:52 AM
BeerMoney BeerMoney is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Getting Electrocuted.
Posts: 4,587
Default Re: Kings vs paired door card


Frappe, the only thing I may do differently is go for a check raise on 4th.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.