Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 05-16-2006, 07:36 AM
twang twang is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: spite folding
Posts: 770
Default Re: NL100 KQ top pair

I like it. Hero hasn't exactly shown a lot of strength: both the pf-raise and the flop bet was on the small side and the turn bet on the flush card was a bit probe-ish. I can imagine even passive players trying to pick up the pot if we check the river and that would leave us with a tricky decision. I think a blocker (maybe a slightly smaller one) is perfectly fine here.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-16-2006, 07:52 AM
DWarrior DWarrior is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: stealing your food
Posts: 3,106
Default Re: NL100 KQ top pair

Again, is it just me here? I bet $7/$8 here on the flop.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-16-2006, 08:23 AM
jii jii is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Making love to Scandinavian blondes
Posts: 740
Default Re: NL100 KQ top pair

[ QUOTE ]
Again, is it just me here? I bet $7/$8 here on the flop.

[/ QUOTE ]

It's not you. $6 bet screams "I'm weak!"...
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-16-2006, 09:23 AM
Mr. Sakuraba Mr. Sakuraba is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Somewhere between fish and pro...
Posts: 255
Default Re: NL100 KQ top pair

Two things i dont like.

1.KQs is not a hand i want to be raising utg.
2.The flop bet is too small. Make it at least 8.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-16-2006, 09:23 AM
pho75 pho75 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 290
Default Re: NL100 KQ top pair

I don't like the preflop raise or the flop cbet, but the rest seems fine. I might have made a value/blocking bet on the river, something like $15.

The reason I don't like the preflop raise is to keep you out of this exact situation. KQs is not strong enough to play OOP. A calling station like CO is going to call you with a variety of hands and you will only hit the flop about %35 of the time. Most of the time you will be OOP, without a hand, facing a calling station.

This brings me to my second point. I don't like that cbet at all. You are trying to bluff a classic calling station. Never do that. Actually this is a perfect spot NOT to cbet. SB has already checked and CO is not going to bluff you. If he does bet, you can safely fold, knowing he has a better hand.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-16-2006, 09:29 AM
DWarrior DWarrior is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: stealing your food
Posts: 3,106
Default Re: NL100 KQ top pair

I'm borderline nit 18/14, and I open raise KQ from any position :\
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-16-2006, 09:32 AM
Dan Bitel Dan Bitel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bork! Bork! Bork!
Posts: 11,164
Default Re: NL100 KQ top pair

RAISING KQs UTG 6MAX IS PRETTY DAMN STANDARD Y'ALL
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-16-2006, 09:34 AM
DWarrior DWarrior is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: stealing your food
Posts: 3,106
Default Re: NL100 KQ top pair

Also, wouldn't we have a similar problem with AQ in this spot?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-16-2006, 10:31 AM
vulturesrow vulturesrow is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Old Right
Posts: 7,937
Default Re: NL100 KQ top pair

[ QUOTE ]
RAISING KQs UTG 6MAX IS PRETTY DAMN STANDARD Y'ALL

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-17-2006, 10:55 AM
pho75 pho75 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 290
Default Re: NL100 KQ top pair

What kind of an edge do you think you have when you raise KQ UTG?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.