how can this NOT be collusion?

[Chairman Wood]

[ QUOTE ]
thought that but the HUUUGE edge we get from collusion over the internet is nullified somewhat b/c even if we have a system of signals, he can SEE tham and figure it out eventually...so we'd either have to create a seriously intense system (and likely look like IDIOTS signalling meaningfully to each other....picture the 3rd base coach), or play with only one or two types of smallish collusion.

Barron




[/ QUOTE ]
Why not just sit next to each other and turn around (or walk to the corner of the room) after every street and discuss a battle plan. If he knows your colluding there should be no issue with you guys openly talking to each other.

[Fabian]

The obvious solution here is to simply learn telepathy.

[DcifrThs]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
thought that but the HUUUGE edge we get from collusion over the internet is nullified somewhat b/c even if we have a system of signals, he can SEE tham and figure it out eventually...so we'd either have to create a seriously intense system (and likely look like IDIOTS signalling meaningfully to each other....picture the 3rd base coach), or play with only one or two types of smallish collusion.

Barron




[/ QUOTE ]
Why not just sit next to each other and turn around (or walk to the corner of the room) after every street and discuss a battle plan. If he knows your colluding there should be no issue with you guys openly talking to each other.

[/ QUOTE ]

haha, true, but id like to play more than 5hands/hr.

unless we can set it up so neverwin has a table behind him where he can turn around and play hongbird HU while mikey and i perfect the collusion strategy lol

then maybe he'd be entertained and we would just have to earn a lot from each pot

Barron

[TheWorstPlayer]

Even if you don't signal, it should be enough just that you are playing in such a way so that you OR Schneids wins the pot and that Schneids is doing the same, I would think.

[The Bride]

[ QUOTE ]
haha, true, but id like to play more than 5hands/hr.


[/ QUOTE ]

You wouldn't need to discuss every hand - just showing one another your cards should be sufficient, no?

[DcifrThs]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
haha, true, but id like to play more than 5hands/hr.


[/ QUOTE ]

You wouldn't need to discuss every hand - just showing one another your cards should be sufficient, no?

[/ QUOTE ]

oh dude, hed have no chance...forgot we could just show and do what we think is best, which we'd likely often agree.

Barron

[UprightCreature]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
haha, true, but id like to play more than 5hands/hr.


[/ QUOTE ]

You wouldn't need to discuss every hand - just showing one another your cards should be sufficient, no?

[/ QUOTE ]

oh dude, hed have no chance...forgot we could just show and do what we think is best, which we'd likely often agree.

Barron

[/ QUOTE ]

Sit close, share hole hards, and you could add in a really simple signal system that was below the table level for the cases where it wasn't obvious. I doubt you would need to many signals just things like wether you were going to jam or best hand him ect. This seems like it would be really easy as long as you spent some prep time going over optimal collusion strategy before hand.

[Erik W]

Anyone thought about that a hand like J8s and A9o,ATo,AQo,AKo will make a great colluding combination. It is very likely either hand is hit. I'd put some money on that DumbaAnimal oh, I mean Neverwin well, Dustin held any of those hands.

[daisyglaze]

You could have the same person play both hands live. This is the way it is online, right?

[FoxwoodsFiend]

[quote I doubt you would need to many signals just things like wether you were going to jam or best hand him ect.

[/ QUOTE ]

I've heard it come up often in discussing cheating-what is best handing exactly?