The Fate of #756 by Marc Ecko

[vhawk01]

[ QUOTE ]
speaking of strawmen


evidence necessary to convict in a criminal trial is nowhere close to preponderance of evidence or ability to think logically



Look at what Bonds has said
add up all the little things
look at his numbers
look at his pictures

hmmmmmmmmmm... there are quite alot of things I don't have 100% proof for, but it would be insane for me not to believe them




keep going there Cochran

[/ QUOTE ]

Dude, RedBean, how could you possibly have been so negligent as to forget about "the little things?"

[MyTurn2Raise]

[ QUOTE ]
Is that why OJ was found liable in civil court, yet they havn't even gotten enough evidence on Barry to even have an indictment?

[/ QUOTE ]

tougher to find 'victims' in one setting

[vhawk01]

[ QUOTE ]
Red Bean....do you have reading comprehension skills?

who said that OJ's killing equated to Bond's use of performance enhancing substances?


that's right...no one


what has been said is that the amount of evidence v Barry is similar to that v OJ

it's also been said that your 'defense' of Bonds is simlar to that of Cochran defending OJ


but, congrats in trying to discredit the other side by completely misportraying the other side yet again
you sure pwned that imaginary point

[/ QUOTE ]

Are you serious, the amount of evidence is about the same?

You understand OJ went to trial? Maybe you saw it on TV at some point? It was kind of big news.

You also understand that Bonds has never even been indicted, much less tried? But you think that they pretty much have the same amount of evidence, huh?

[MyTurn2Raise]

[ QUOTE ]
This isn't about Bonds. This is about defacing a piece of the history that some of us still hold sacred.

As for Ecko not being a prick because the people made the decision, a) The voters only know what a biased media has taught them b) Putting the asterisk on the ball doesn't do a lot of good for anyone, while it upsets people who hold the game the way I do and c) In the end, he's the one who decided to do this with the ball.

To those who are saying the hall should refuse it, collecting the memorabilia of the game is what the hall does. They have little choice in the matter.

[/ QUOTE ]

the asterik is even more perfect cuz the mark is what the 'fans' deserve as well

[vhawk01]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Is that why OJ was found liable in civil court, yet they havn't even gotten enough evidence on Barry to even have an indictment?

[/ QUOTE ]

tougher to find 'victims' in one setting

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL, this is a great argument.

[MyTurn2Raise]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Red Bean....do you have reading comprehension skills?

who said that OJ's killing equated to Bond's use of performance enhancing substances?


that's right...no one


what has been said is that the amount of evidence v Barry is similar to that v OJ

it's also been said that your 'defense' of Bonds is simlar to that of Cochran defending OJ


but, congrats in trying to discredit the other side by completely misportraying the other side yet again
you sure pwned that imaginary point

[/ QUOTE ]

Are you serious, the amount of evidence is about the same?

You understand OJ went to trial? Maybe you saw it on TV at some point? It was kind of big news.

You also understand that Bonds has never even been indicted, much less tried? But you think that they pretty much have the same amount of evidence, huh?

[/ QUOTE ]


hahahahhaahhahahahahah

yep...very similar in that it's blatantly obvious

[MyTurn2Raise]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Is that why OJ was found liable in civil court, yet they havn't even gotten enough evidence on Barry to even have an indictment?

[/ QUOTE ]

tougher to find 'victims' in one setting

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL, this is a great argument.

[/ QUOTE ]

it is ... think about it

[MyTurn2Raise]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
speaking of strawmen


evidence necessary to convict in a criminal trial is nowhere close to preponderance of evidence or ability to think logically



Look at what Bonds has said
add up all the little things
look at his numbers
look at his pictures

hmmmmmmmmmm... there are quite alot of things I don't have 100% proof for, but it would be insane for me not to believe them




keep going there Cochran

[/ QUOTE ]

Dude, RedBean, how could you possibly have been so negligent as to forget about "the little things?"

[/ QUOTE ]

I notice, once again, someone glossing over stuff and trying to identify one point where they can try to twist a semantic argument to discredit the rest of what was said


congrats

[MikeyPatriot]

[ QUOTE ]
the asterik is even more perfect cuz the mark is what the 'fans' deserve as well

[/ QUOTE ]

Are you on drugs again? WTF does this even mean?

[MyTurn2Raise]

read this thread... it's pretty clear what I mean