![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: what to do? | |||
| Push - you have a flush |
|
15 | 71.43% |
| Fold - he must have the nuts |
|
6 | 28.57% |
| Voters: 21. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#181
|
|||
|
|||
|
4.
|
|
#182
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
wtf is wrong with everybody...i've read a page of these things and i'll tell ya my gut immediately said 5. looked at 3 pictures. closed them, looked again...yup, still a 5. she is average imo. anybody who said 1 or 2 is clearly retarded. anybody who said 3 is slightly wrong imo. anybody who said 4 is probably OK...definitely more OK than somebody who said she's a 6. Barron [/ QUOTE ] My scale is like the school grading scale of A-F. I gave her a 6, or a D. Works for me. |
|
#183
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] amazing. i probably made some coworkers think i was nuts laughing at this one. [/ QUOTE ] This picture in combo with the "tooth-to-gum-ratio corrective surgery" line made me cry I was laughing so hard! |
|
#184
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
The mode the 4?! I don't think everyone is operating on the same scale -- 5 is avg people. [/ QUOTE ] 5 is below average. 5.5 is average. |
|
#185
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] The mode the 4?! I don't think everyone is operating on the same scale -- 5 is avg people. [/ QUOTE ] 5 is below average. 5.5 is average. [/ QUOTE ] There are more ugly girls than hot girls. |
|
#186
|
|||
|
|||
|
Anyone who rated this girl a 1 is an idiot. She's not nearly fat enough to be a 1. You want to see a 1? Here's a 1:
![]() Hell, she might even be a 2 considering how many women in this country are fatter and uglier. |
|
#187
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Big arms, fat under the arm, sideburns, possible mustache? Not sure but that seems like a 4. [/ QUOTE ] how the [censored] can all that stuff lead to a 4? Good god. [/ QUOTE ] Again, it's a bad picture, but you obviously overrate the average woman. This is a 1: http://www.wayodd.com/funny-pictures...chicks-09U.jpg If you don't see that the OPs candidate is at least two orders away from this, then please never leave your brain's charmed world of supermodels, sunshine, lollipops, rainbows and marshmallows. [/ QUOTE ] It's always been my understanding that The Scale does not refer to the average "woman" but rather the average "girl". That is to say, it only includes sexually mature females under 35ish, and unusually attractive middle aged women. If we included every sexually mature woman in the world in our rankings and 5 was average, then the average college co-ed would be an 8 or 9 by default! [/ QUOTE ] Yes, the average college co-ed is like a 7 or an 8. And? |
|
#188
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Look, I know this has gotten said a bit, but when I think of a four, I think of--you know, like Lindsay Davenport or maybe the big chick in Heart or someone. Come on. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] The moment I saw this picture, I heard an audible voice in my head say "FOUR." That's just how my brain works, I guess. [/ QUOTE ] Solid 6. Almost no one who's not fat is under 6 IMO. You realize that more than half of the women in this country are fat, right? |
|
#189
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
I voted 2. I dont think you can vote for a 1, b/c there are obv. less attractive girls out there. However, she's not a 5 either, b/c 5 is average. And WTF at the vote-tards who gave 10's. [/ QUOTE ] The 10 voters are no more retarded than the 1 & 2 voters. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] |
|
#190
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] < 1 I don't believe in the bell curve for rating women, by the way. I'm easily repulsed by nasty ladies. [/ QUOTE ] that's another big issue with these polls. people get worked up because they think someone is a 2 (meaning 80% are better looking) while others think she's a 4 (using the normal distribution, meaning 1 sd below average) and really they mean about the same thing. [/ QUOTE ] This isn't true. pirateboy sees no difference between the two in the mcdonald's pic and the 3 1's in the OPs pic #3 and he's FOS. If he was forced to choose to bang one of them on the threat of death, he'd certainly mentally rank them quickly. [/ QUOTE ] Im with him, there is no difference between a chick that is 250, and a chick that is 200, Im not banging either one of them, they are both ones. Pirateboy is right. [/ QUOTE ] Whether you would bang them or not is irrelevant to rating them. |
![]() |
|
|