![]() |
|
#181
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Anyway, I'm done with this discussion. Lets just say I have no doubt that I'm right. [/ QUOTE ] And on that note, let's all pop a couple aspirin. |
|
#182
|
|||
|
|||
|
Just as an example, if you have a team that abnormally will cover 12 (vs. 6) points more than what is expected in general, then it may be more +EV to teas that team vs playing them straight up at +6. I don't know if your system generates this type of analysis, but certainly its feasible.
No, its not. For a few reasons: A) The way scoring is done in the NFL. After you cross the 3/7, the chances of a game landing on a particular # drop considerably. Making your theroy basically mathmatically impossible. B) No handicapper (well a winning one) is that enamored with himself enough to think that he can predict the scores of games within 6 points (again, unless the line is in the 3/7 area) Anyway, I'm done with this discussion. Lets just say I have no doubt that I'm right. Funny, I was goign to say the SAME exact thing [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
|
#183
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quite honestly the single conclusion I'm coming to is open teasers are the only way to go. Closed, even $ teasers are awfully nice but they still force you into the unfavorable situation of picking teaser -EV games.
|
|
#184
|
|||
|
|||
|
Miami/Tampa Bay over 33.5 -111.1
$166.69 to win $150.00 10/11/05 Note: -105 is the highest number to play for a 3 unit bet on over 33.5. -120 is the highest number to play for a 2 unit bet. FYI The line appears to have changed in the 20 minutes since I've made the bet. Cross-posted to SYGamel's NFL Picks |
|
#185
|
|||
|
|||
|
Miami Dolphins +4 -102
$51.00 to win $50.00 10/12/05 Note: -107 is the highest number to play for a bet at +4. |
|
#186
|
|||
|
|||
|
Since this line has shot through the ceiling in the last 24 hours (usually a good sign as sharp bettors move totals whereas unsavvy bettors generally move pointspreads), I'm going to change the wager requirements to the following:
Mia/TB ov 35 -- +104 is the lowest number to play for a 3 unit bet. -110 is the highest number to play for a 2 unit bet. -129 is the highest number to play for a 1 unit bet. |
|
#187
|
|||
|
|||
|
Houston Texans +10 -120
$120.00 to win $100.00 10/13/05 Note: -110 is the highest number to play for a 3 unit bet at +10. -127 is the highest number to play for a 2 unit bet. -150 is the hiest number to play for a 1 unit bet. FYI This line is moving quickly downward. |
|
#188
|
|||
|
|||
|
Houston Texans to win +373
$13.40 to win $50.00 10/13/05 Note: +365 is the lowest number to play for a bet on this game. Cross-posted to SYGamel's NFL Picks |
|
#189
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Since this line has shot through the ceiling in the last 24 hours (usually a good sign as sharp bettors move totals whereas unsavvy bettors generally move pointspreads), I'm going to change the wager requirements to the following: Mia/TB ov 35 -- +104 is the lowest number to play for a 3 unit bet. -110 is the highest number to play for a 2 unit bet. -129 is the highest number to play for a 1 unit bet. [/ QUOTE ] ov 35 -110 is a losing proposition 34 is a key number in regards to totals. you had a great bet in over 33.5, dont ruin it by putting more money on a bad number. |
|
#190
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm aware 34 is a key number, however I already put my entire bet in at ov 33.5. I am suggesting to anyone following my picks that it is still safe to bet ov 35 though at reduced units (check out the respective notes for post 8 and post 8 (ii)).
|
![]() |
|
|