|
|
#181
07-18-2006, 06:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Russ Boyd $50K HORSE entrant
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Clearly the moderators aren't going to actually respond to our punk-ass concerns since Granny is untouchable. Good thing, too - his posts are so informative! [/ QUOTE ] minion [/ QUOTE ] Minion of whom exactly? I'm not getting the whole minion thing unless they are subordinates to someone. [/ QUOTE ] rofl seems like you understand it perfectly. [/ QUOTE ] minion 
|
|
#182
07-18-2006, 07:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Russ Boyd $50K HORSE entrant
[ QUOTE ]
Thanks for the condescending link. [/ QUOTE ] That wasn't condescending, based on your "Anyone who has taken Business 101 knows that a company's owners aren't liable" comment, it was clear that you did not know about this principle, I merely decided to educate you. Condescending would be, for example, making dozens of posts correcting other people's grammar (including non-native english speakers), and insulting them for said grammar. [ QUOTE ] But I'm not asking your distinguished opinion about whether a corporate veil can be pierced due to fraud or other reasons. I'm asking you to support your assertion that "indeed, based on the facts of this case, it sounds like he would be liable, at least under U.S. law". I do apologize for asking you to take the time to back up your statement. [/ QUOTE ] I never asserted that Boyd definitely could be sued, merely that it was possible for him to be sued. As I am obviously not familiar with all the facts (and neither are you), I cannot give a definitive answer. I was merely replying to your assinine "Business 101" comment, in which you made an absolute statement as to the liability of business-owners, a statement that was incorrect. [ QUOTE ] Good assumption, since it appears to be uncontradicted. So now let's talk about "appearing to commit fraud." Hint: that's not the same as screwing up and going bankrupt. [/ QUOTE ] No, committing fraud would be something along the lines of lying to your customers regarding the security of the money they keep with you. Pretty much all the reports I've read include Boyd lying right up to the very end to his customers, in an effort to prevent them from cashing out. Thats what we call fraud. Keep in mind, once again, that all I ever asserted was that your statement that Dutch Boyd couldn't be sued because owners of businesses can't be sued for business debts was retarded. I stand by that. Now why don't you scamper off and correct someone else's grammar.
|
|
#183
07-18-2006, 07:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Russ Boyd $50K HORSE entrant
[ QUOTE ]
the fact that you say "you guys dont see eye to eye" is just such a silly copout i dont even know what to say. granny has ONLY trolled me. if there were significant points to argue that might be nice. but its seriously only trolling. how granny is not banned is so far beyond me. i just assume the moderators either a) have their heads up their asses. b) dont care about their forum at all. i contacted them and they just flat out tell me that they dont care that grannymae is only a troll and has no other value whatsoever. if thats gonna be ignored, fine, but ill probably stay away from the zoo. i dont like when people are just mind bogglingly stupid to the point of thinking that saying the same flame over and over again is "making a point". i thought human beings had evolved to form rational thought, i guess this makes the zoo title appropriate. rj [/ QUOTE ] ....how would you rather I state it? I was trying to be civil, as I also was trying to be even-handed in the rest of the post. If what you're telling me is that you're getting no satisfaction from certain mods when you voice a complaint, welcome to the rest of the world. It sure doesn't seem as if you mind 'using' those mods with whom you are friendly to advance your case, however. That's a sword that cuts both ways. Is your response above all that you have to say in regard to my answer to your question?
|
|
#184
07-18-2006, 07:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Russ Boyd $50K HORSE entrant
my qualm is that people act like there is this "argument" with "valid points" going on between me and grannymae. can someone explain to me when repeating your flame over and over again became a complete, acceptable argument?
rj
|
|
#185
07-18-2006, 07:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Russ Boyd $50K HORSE entrant
RJ - I think you are repeating over and over again that granny is repeating his flame over and over again.
(although you have mentioned a few other things in there too)
|
|
#186
07-18-2006, 07:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Russ Boyd $50K HORSE entrant
[ QUOTE ]
RJ - I think you are repeating over and over again that granny is repeating his flame over and over again. (although you have mentioned a few other things in there too) [/ QUOTE ] ....what he says! [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
|
#187
07-18-2006, 07:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Russ Boyd $50K HORSE entrant
[ QUOTE ]
RJ - I think you are repeating over and over again that granny is repeating his flame over and over again. (although you have mentioned a few other things in there too) [/ QUOTE ] okay, so youve made the distinction that granny and i are both arguing one point repeatedly. however, my point isnt a total flame. this being the case i am a bit worried at how people could see this as being an equal discussion. ill keep pointing out its trolling until some mod actually decides to do something about it...ever... rj
|
|
#188
07-18-2006, 07:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Russ Boyd $50K HORSE entrant
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] RJ - I think you are repeating over and over again that granny is repeating his flame over and over again. (although you have mentioned a few other things in there too) [/ QUOTE ] okay, so youve made the distinction that granny and i are both arguing one point repeatedly. however, my point isnt a total flame. this being the case i am a bit worried at how people could see this as being an equal discussion. ill keep pointing out its trolling until some mod actually decides to do something about it...ever... rj [/ QUOTE ] ....aw c'mon, kid. Trolling...schmolling. Give it a rest.
|
|
#189
07-18-2006, 08:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Russ Boyd $50K HORSE entrant
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] RJ - I think you are repeating over and over again that granny is repeating his flame over and over again. (although you have mentioned a few other things in there too) [/ QUOTE ] okay, so youve made the distinction that granny and i are both arguing one point repeatedly. however, my point isnt a total flame. this being the case i am a bit worried at how people could see this as being an equal discussion. ill keep pointing out its trolling until some mod actually decides to do something about it...ever... rj [/ QUOTE ] pointing this out over and over again would mean that YOU are the one doing the trolling. I don't think you or granny have behaved terribly well throughout this discussion and I don't really care 'who started it' or who's been acting worse. I'm not acting as a mod now. This isn't my forum. Just offering my observation that I think you've already made your point and you can let it rest now. Behaving worse and worse just to try to REALLY prove your point is not going to help your cause at all. You've already pointed out what you see as a double-standard from the mods. Saying it again only hurts you.
|
|
#190
07-18-2006, 08:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Russ Boyd $50K HORSE entrant
All,
its situations like that OOT survivor was invented which could of course be modified into a Zoo Survivor. I am quite certain that one day my moderating brilliance will be appreciated and I will installed as King mod over all of 2+2 and when that happens we all shall rejoice. well all of us except for the many I get rid of.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
