|
|
#172
04-06-2006, 12:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: how can this NOT be collusion?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] oh that would be so sweet. i wonder if he'll take side action on that. can we get two guys together? james? barron? bk? [/ QUOTE ] well i think it's safe to say you can count me out... a 3 handed game with another good player and neverwin...forgive me if i say no thanks. i mean, c'mon, i stopped playing 1/2+ b/c of the variance, i wonder if this game would have any swings lol Barron [/ QUOTE ] You are a moron he is talking about playing 3 handed and letting the other two players collude vs him. He thinks he'd win. 
|
|
#173
04-06-2006, 02:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: how can this NOT be collusion?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] oh that would be so sweet. i wonder if he'll take side action on that. can we get two guys together? james? barron? bk? [/ QUOTE ] well i think it's safe to say you can count me out... a 3 handed game with another good player and neverwin...forgive me if i say no thanks. i mean, c'mon, i stopped playing 1/2+ b/c of the variance, i wonder if this game would have any swings lol Barron [/ QUOTE ] You are a moron he is talking about playing 3 handed and letting the other two players collude vs him. He thinks he'd win. [/ QUOTE ] BITE ME. [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img] HUHU? Barron
|
|
#174
04-06-2006, 02:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: how can this NOT be collusion?
[ QUOTE ]
I think he was talking about letting us 2 collude. I'll gladly play. [/ QUOTE ] is he serious? he'd play KNOWINGLY allowing us to collude?? wow. thats ego. he has no shot Barron
|
|
#176
04-06-2006, 02:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: how can this NOT be collusion?
[ QUOTE ]
In theory, how much would nw lose in this game, against open colluders who can do it how much they want? [/ QUOTE ] see my new post. i have a few thoughts but want to get more first. Barron
|
|
#177
04-06-2006, 02:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: how can this NOT be collusion?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] In theory, how much would nw lose in this game, against open colluders who can do it how much they want? [/ QUOTE ] see my new post. i have a few thoughts but want to get more first. Barron [/ QUOTE ] I think it's time for Schneid's and Barron to make a BKesque post issuing an open challenge to Neverwin to play any stakes where they are allowed to collude.
|
|
#178
04-06-2006, 03:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: how can this NOT be collusion?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] In theory, how much would nw lose in this game, against open colluders who can do it how much they want? [/ QUOTE ] see my new post. i have a few thoughts but want to get more first. Barron [/ QUOTE ] I think it's time for Schneid's and Barron to make a BKesque post issuing an open challenge to Neverwin to play any stakes where they are allowed to collude. [/ QUOTE ] he would never accept. it's way too big of an advantage. plus he could then easily get our accounts closed when he loses the challange. Unless of course we get a pokersite to ALLOW us to collude to prove (or rather supply evidence of )how much of an advantage accrues to the colluders. Barron
|
|
#179
04-06-2006, 03:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: how can this NOT be collusion?
Play live.
|
|
#180
04-06-2006, 03:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: how can this NOT be collusion?
[ QUOTE ]
Play live. [/ QUOTE ] i thought that but the HUUUGE edge we get from collusion over the internet is nullified somewhat b/c even if we have a system of signals, he can SEE tham and figure it out eventually...so we'd either have to create a seriously intense system (and likely look like IDIOTS signalling meaningfully to each other....picture the 3rd base coach), or play with only one or two types of smallish collusion. Barron
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
