I own mike mautsow

[Slow Play Ray]

this is a funny thread. thanks guys.

[Rolen]

I will PM highstakes.nu, but (and this is directed towards people who aren't going to stick by G2CU no matter what)

Who is more likely to have skewed results. The guy running the automated datamining site that doesn't know us or care which way the bet goes (and that posted his results soon after learning about the thread) or the guy with a vested interest in the outcome who took an age to post even though he was being PMed about the thread all over the place.

We're not going to be able to resolve this unless we get another independant datamining source. You can cite G2CU's data, I can say that if you add G2CU's 25/50 data to highstakes.nu's 50/100+ data he comes up 10K short.

[TheWorstPlayer]

I'll stay with g2cu no matter what, obv. His comments about being 'up 10k' were not from PT, which is why they were 'ballpark', they were from his starting and ending BR. BR does not lie. So let's just get some more confirmation of complete, accurate, results and I am confident I will prevail.

[Rolen]

He started a new PT database, imported all of his processed hands from Jan 1st except for a few 50/100+ hands where he lost 10K+. That is why he has 7 less hands and is why he took so long to post. Why would an automated system accidently pick up 7 hands from the next day?

It would've been much better to fake a few 25/50 hands that had him winning 10K, but that is difficult and much more time consuming.

I don't blame you for trusting your friend but my conclusions are logical. Unfortuantely, conjecture is not enough to settle our bet. We need a dataminer.

[TheWorstPlayer]

This is all just conjecture so it doesn't really matter. We just need reliable results and then we'll be fine. But your thoughts are not really that logical, FWIW. If he wanted to cheat, he would have taken the 10K in losses out of the 25/50 data. Then the 50/100+ would have matched exactly (lending credence to the 25/50 data) and he would have shown the 38K+ winnings needed at 25/50...

[Rolen]

That's true.

Maybe he's not too bright. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

You're connected enough to find someone that has the true results, right? I mean, someone must datamine 25/50 and up.

[TheWorstPlayer]

unfortunately, i'm not connected at all... [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[fsuplayer]

this thread rulz.

[TheWorstPlayer]

[ QUOTE ]
this thread rulz.

[/ QUOTE ]
Glad we can entertain. Don't you have or know someone who has FTP high stakes action mined comprehensively?

[mmbt0ne]

maybe highstakes.nu also counts hands where he's sitting out?