|
|
#161
06-12-2007, 05:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OK, Here\'s The Truth
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] David, "Let me know who wants to lay 6-5 against her after I'm done." What is the wager? [/ QUOTE ] NLH. 5K freezeout. 100-200 blinds. [/ QUOTE ] David. I will play in a 5k freezeout against brandi if we make it 10/20 or 25/50 blinds. With 100/200 blinds it will be too much of a crapshoot. I also object to the giving of odds in this match, if you think you could coach her into being a good player then she shouldn't deserve odds. I will play this if you give my your word that you will not be speaking to Brandi while the match is being played. I have no way of proving that you are not coaching her as the match would be played online but I will trust you on your honor as a gambler that no one will give her advice while the match is being played. I have sent you a PM about setting up this match. Please let me know when you want it to be played. -Steve 
|
|
#162
06-12-2007, 05:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OK, Here\'s The Truth
David Sklansky, I would like to say you have my moral support, and I can now read twoplustwo.com without feeling dirty (not that there's anything wrong with that!).
Thank you for sharing my moral beliefs and not conducting yourself in anyway that I would consider scandalous.
|
|
#163
06-12-2007, 05:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OK, Here\'s The Truth
Over/Under set at 374 replies.
|
|
#167
06-12-2007, 05:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OK, Here\'s The Truth
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] If she confided in you, it seems somewhat sleazy of you to even mention it here. Unless you cleared it with her first. [/ QUOTE ] That was my first thought. The more non-math/science threads I read by DS the creepier he gets and the less I respect him. [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#168
06-12-2007, 05:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OK, Here\'s The Truth
Someone needs to photoshop a poster of Pygmalion, starring David Sklansky as Henry Higgins and Brandi Hawbaker as Eliza Doolittle.
|
|
#169
06-12-2007, 05:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OK, Here\'s The Truth
I went to some the Pokerstars lounge last year went DS was giving a poker seminar. It turned out to be for total noobs and blatant promotion for his book. Anyways, he kept talking about things in terms of small blinds. Like he would say if you are on the button and you have 20 small blinds it might be correct to go allin with whatever you are holding. My friends and I were pretty confused by his reference to small blinds rather than big blinds.
Cleary this is relevant to this discussion.
|
|
#170
06-12-2007, 05:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OK, Here\'s The Truth
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] David, "Let me know who wants to lay 6-5 against her after I'm done." What is the wager? [/ QUOTE ] NLH. 5K freezeout. 100-200 blinds. [/ QUOTE ] David. I will play in a 5k freezeout against brandi if we make it 10/20 or 25/50 blinds. With 100/200 blinds it will be too much of a crapshoot. I also object to the giving of odds in this match, if you think you could coach her into being a good player then she shouldn't deserve odds. I will play this if you give my your word that you will not be speaking to Brandi while the match is being played. I have no way of proving that you are not coaching her as the match would be played online but I will trust you on your honor as a gambler that no one will give her advice while the match is being played. [/ QUOTE ] What about 10/20, with 6-5 odds, live and not online?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
