![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Samsung 204B or Dell 2007WFP | |||
| Dell 2007WFP |
|
5 | 35.71% |
| Samsung 204B |
|
9 | 64.29% |
| Voters: 14. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1661
|
|||
|
|||
|
welp i had to follow up on rahzero so i decided to have my first +1k day and then some. guess im outta my down swing [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
i honestly doubt i could play this much, play this well, and run this well EVAR again lol. all of this is 6 tabling 100nl [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
|
#1662
|
|||
|
|||
![]() graph from this week. started taking shots at nl100 this week, 500 hands and up around 4 buyins, running hoootttt. |
|
#1663
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
GRAPHS ARE FUN! [/ QUOTE ] Yo thac, When I watched your first video there were some really mind-numbingly bad plays which I saw you made, and not just one of them, there were HEAPS of spots where I was like jesus is this for real? From memory, very loose play in raised pots, no concept of position, far too aggressive in raised pots betting into opponent ranges whilst clearly behind etc etc. Its nothing you cant find yourself, but what Im saying is that you definitely have some leaks to plug. Good luck with becoming the new you [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] , and hit me up if you want a sweat or something. |
|
#1664
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
welp i had to follow up on rahzero so i decided to have my first +1k day and then some. guess im outta my down swing [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] i honestly doubt i could play this much, play this well, and run this well EVAR again lol. all of this is 6 tabling 100nl [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] this is awesome kaz, well done |
|
#1665
|
|||
|
|||
|
1k days are nice. My biggest is +400 or so [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] worst -900.
But my BR is finnally steady above 3k [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] SIHB |
|
#1666
|
|||
|
|||
|
Villain insta left table. I think he was in real pain.
Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $0.50 BB (5 handed) Hand History converter Courtesy of PokerZion.com saw flop|<font color="#C00000">saw showdown</font> Button ($174.42) <font color="#C00000">Hero ($50.70)</font> BB ($61.80) <font color="#C00000">UTG ($59.40)</font> MP ($50) Preflop: Hero is SB with T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]. MP posts a blind of $0.50. <font color="#CC3333">UTG raises to $1.5</font>, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, Hero calls $1.25, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>. Flop: ($4) 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $3</font>, UTG calls $3. Turn: ($10) A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $6</font>, UTG calls $6. River: ($22) 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">Hero checks</font>, <font color="#CC3333">UTG calls $48.90 (All-In)</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero calls $40.20 (All-In)</font>. Final Pot: $111.10 Results below: Hero has Ts As (flush, ace high). UTG has 8c Kc (two pair, kings and eights). Outcome: Hero wins $102.40. UTG wins $8.69. |
|
#1667
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Why can't a get a seat at Gelford's tables? I want to pwn him so hard [/ QUOTE ] you will get your shot ...
|
|
#1668
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is this a common looking graph for a day? LOL at swingaments
|
|
#1669
|
|||
|
|||
|
I was very surpirsed reading this thread from BBV ("50NL isn't real poker")
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...=0#Post10050596 What surprised me was seeing so many respected SS regs (illuminati, tufat, deaders) saying they had trouble with 50NL. I'm wondering if a good sustainable winrate (and I don't mean over 30k goddam hands which many people seem to consider adequete) is harder at 50NL than 100NL? Sounds ridiculous, but some pretty smart 2+2ers seem to be suggesting so. |
|
#1670
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
I was very surpirsed reading this thread from BBV ("50NL isn't real poker") http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...=0#Post10050596 What surprised me was seeing so many respected SS regs (illuminati, tufat, deaders) saying they had trouble with 50NL. I'm wondering if a good sustainable winrate (and I don't mean over 30k goddam hands which many people seem to consider adequete) is harder at 50NL than 100NL? Sounds ridiculous, but some pretty smart 2+2ers seem to be suggesting so. [/ QUOTE ] Blah .... I can chime in, as I struggled (like pokey and so many more) with 50NL for ages before being able to beat it. I didn't skip it tho, and once I beat it I went on to crush SSNL immediately after. Due to too much experimenting I have blown most of my roll and have been forced to drop down limits like a little baby. I am currently playing 50NL and it is soft as hell. Im sure Kolo will chime in with the same thoughts. 50NL is just the first stake, where people stop being totally passive, so it demands a bit of reading at times, instead of just waiting for premiums and valuebetting overpairs or TPTK. So no 50NL is not harder than 100NL by any means, it is just a big hurdle at first [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
![]() |
|
|