How many online pros average +500k a year in the world?

[Dave Mac]

this is totally wrong.

[Borys313]

[ QUOTE ]
100% - They ain't pro unless they making $500k+, thats £250k in England, couldn't even by you a decent house.

[/ QUOTE ]

How many people can actually buy a decent house for they 1 year earnings? 1 percent of all the employed or even less?

[MicroBob]

Yeah, my heart bleeds for all those poor souls 'only' making 250k in England.

[mindstatez]

Wow only 250k? Those donks must not read enough BBV, where even the 16 year olds average ~750,000 yr.

[2eazy]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
even cbnz will make 500 this year and hes the biggest nit int he world [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Too bad you are both pussies and never give action to anyone. Only reason you are making that much money is because of how soft the games were. You should prolly invest all your moneys now and and retire from poker.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ummm i don't give action? i will never deny action heads up and i play 27-23 how is that not given anyone action?

[cbnz]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
even cbnz will make 500 this year and hes the biggest nit int he world [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Too bad you are both pussies and never give action to anyone. Only reason you are making that much money is because of how soft the games were. You should prolly invest all your moneys now and and retire from poker.

[/ QUOTE ]

and you are? dont be jealous cause we actually win

[Whitewash]

How many 2+2ers made over 500K last year and are on pace to make over 500K this year?

Surely not that many, right? Maybe 20?

[kahntrutahn]

[ QUOTE ]
How many 2+2ers made over 500K last year and are on pace to make over 500K this year?

Surely not that many, right? Maybe 20?

[/ QUOTE ]

I know a few... wait, no I don't [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[Micturition Man]

Regarding fund managers...

This is way off topic but there is a lot of evidence that they really don't contribute anything. They provide superior returns but only if you fail to adjust for increased risk, and they pretty much rip off their customers in terms of fees.

If they were in fact providing abnormal returns they would at least be making the market more efficient, even if they were still ripping off their clients. As it is I really don't think they do anything except add a little volatility.

(There are some outlier funds that really do seem to provide abnormal risk-adjusted returns, to be fair.)

BTW - My main source for this is a recent New Yorker article, but people in the press and academia and other areas of the financial world have suspected this for years.

[ITILTEZ]

Lol. Neither of you ever play me or anyone else that can actually play. Sitting in 10tables 24/7 and sitting out against 49 of 50 opponents qualifies in my mind as not giving action to anyone. Fwiw id love to play some $100k headsup challenge $25 $50 or $50 100.