Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #151  
Old 03-20-2007, 02:53 AM
Michael Fish Michael Fish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 274
Default Re: MOVING BACK UP

Jesus Gelf, fair play mate, you're doing great at 200!
Reply With Quote
  #152  
Old 03-20-2007, 02:59 AM
Zagga Zagga is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 844
Default Re: MOVING BACK UP

Just moved up to 50NL this sunday. any comments on these stats are very much appreciated



Reply With Quote
  #153  
Old 03-20-2007, 03:07 AM
haz31 haz31 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 193
Default Re: MOVING BACK UP



Winrate would be higher except I have a tilt problem that I'm slowly getting under wraps that manages to chew several buyins every so often.
Reply With Quote
  #154  
Old 03-20-2007, 08:06 AM
Jouster777 Jouster777 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: LAG right, nit left
Posts: 1,825
Default Re: Stats By Pot Size

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I had the impression that my biggest leak was losing too many big pots. I thought I did well at picking up a lot of little pots, but called too many pushes when beat. I couldn't find a way to filter hands by pot size in PT so I wrote a simple Access query to do it. My results surprise me. Any comments on what this means? (Other than I suck at poker...)



[/ QUOTE ]

Can you give me this query?

My interpretation - although I don't know how my stats would look like - is that you are bleeding too much chips. Chasing draws, straights, calling down TPMK... This could be a reason why you lose many pots from $10-30.
But this is really just a thought! May be total BS.

[/ QUOTE ]I think we need to see a bunch of people with the same stats to say what's good or what's bad. We all get mid-weakly made hands that we give up on after some resistance...I bet everyone is negative in the lower ranges because we see flops and fold, we cbet and fold, etc. The big hand positives mean he's extracting more than being extracted upon...but also this should probably be positive for any decent player.
Reply With Quote
  #155  
Old 03-20-2007, 08:24 AM
Jouster777 Jouster777 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: LAG right, nit left
Posts: 1,825
Default Re: **Official uNL Stats thread**

[ QUOTE ]
i run 22/17 trying to raise my aggression factor its around 2.75 or something.

My numbers will widely vary during my sessions from table to table, some tables ill be over 30 some tables ill be under 15 VPIP but when they average all together its almost always 22.5

[/ QUOTE ]Why are you trying to raise your aggression factor? Do you want to fold more or raise more?
Reply With Quote
  #156  
Old 03-20-2007, 08:28 AM
Lordy Lordy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: I\'m a crazy nit!
Posts: 610
Default Re: **Official uNL Stats thread**

Already posted graph and stats in BBV (Here), but I'm posting my stats here again :



NL5 and 10 I don't care about, but any comments on my NL25 and 50 stats appreciated.
I don't have PT on this computer, but Position stats are like 12/12 UTG and 30/20 OTB.
Reply With Quote
  #157  
Old 03-20-2007, 09:25 AM
china_hard china_hard is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 212
Default Re: **Official uNL Stats thread**



Hey. I'm new around here. Ive just been playing FTP 50nl for the past month after several months pretty much off playing poker at all. I have another 10-15,000 hands between mine and my girlfriend's laptops at around the same stats.

As you can see, my shot at 100nl didn't go so well. I was up 6 or 7 buy-ins after 6,000 hands and then ran badly. I am thinking that my next shot at all 100nl will be fairly soon, although it was significantly harder than 50nl.
Reply With Quote
  #158  
Old 03-20-2007, 10:05 AM
haz31 haz31 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 193
Default Re: **Official uNL Stats thread**

Lordy your W$SD is very high, maybe your folding too much on the river or you aren't value betting light enough.

Or your only getting to show down in a few large pots where you are loosing, and lots of small pots your winning.
Reply With Quote
  #159  
Old 03-20-2007, 10:13 AM
Lordy Lordy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: I\'m a crazy nit!
Posts: 610
Default Re: **Official uNL Stats thread**

[ QUOTE ]
Lordy your W$SD is very high, maybe your folding too much on the river or you aren't value betting light enough.

Or your only getting to show down in a few large pots where you are loosing, and lots of small pots your winning.

[/ QUOTE ]

55% is very high ? Meh, I agree that I don't value bet enough on the river though, I'm trying to work on that...
Reply With Quote
  #160  
Old 03-20-2007, 10:21 AM
gball gball is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 89
Default Re: Stats By Pot Size

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I had the impression that my biggest leak was losing too many big pots. I thought I did well at picking up a lot of little pots, but called too many pushes when beat. I couldn't find a way to filter hands by pot size in PT so I wrote a simple Access query to do it. My results surprise me. Any comments on what this means? (Other than I suck at poker...)



[/ QUOTE ]

Can you give me this query?

My interpretation - although I don't know how my stats would look like - is that you are bleeding too much chips. Chasing draws, straights, calling down TPMK... This could be a reason why you lose many pots from $10-30.
But this is really just a thought! May be total BS.

[/ QUOTE ]I think we need to see a bunch of people with the same stats to say what's good or what's bad. We all get mid-weakly made hands that we give up on after some resistance...I bet everyone is negative in the lower ranges because we see flops and fold, we cbet and fold, etc. The big hand positives mean he's extracting more than being extracted upon...but also this should probably be positive for any decent player.

[/ QUOTE ]

The biggest losing range, 10 to 19.99, assuming those stats are from NL50, it could be because of: raise and get a call, pot is $4.50. Cbet $3.50 with air and get a call or raise, pot is within 10 and 19.99.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.