![]() |
|
#141
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
** Additional disclaimer ** My wife is pregnant and due June 15th. Currently, we are 100% healthy and on track for an on-time delivery, but were the baby to come early this could greatly increase my play (After birth, i get 2 weeks paid paternity leave, which would give me much more time to play). [/ QUOTE ] having just had a kid, you are way way way off on this one. you'll be playing very little. but congrats nonetheless, good to hear all are healthy. |
|
#142
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
** Additional disclaimer ** My wife is pregnant and due June 15th. Currently, we are 100% healthy and on track for an on-time delivery, but were the baby to come early this could greatly increase my play (After birth, i get 2 weeks paid paternity leave, which would give me much more time to play). [/ QUOTE ] Dude, get your priorities straight, or don't bother playing. Jeez. |
|
#143
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] ** Additional disclaimer ** My wife is pregnant and due June 15th. Currently, we are 100% healthy and on track for an on-time delivery, but were the baby to come early this could greatly increase my play (After birth, i get 2 weeks paid paternity leave, which would give me much more time to play). [/ QUOTE ] Dude, get your priorities straight, or don't bother playing. Jeez. [/ QUOTE ] Holy [censored]. Some people need to check the batteries in their sarcasm detector. |
|
#144
|
|||
|
|||
|
yeah wow that seemed obvious. ppl don't say things like that in public unless they are joking lol.
oh and lol adanthar. You really have become a lot better at poker in the last week. |
|
#145
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I don't really think it's a good idea to print off stats from the db (not that nat would allow it). First and foremost it would be a nice list of who has run hot for their last 500 or so tournaments, and really wouldn't provide much useful information, and is highly results oriented. There are certain folks with fantastic records in their db over an inaduquate sample size who I would never pick over certain players who are in the red over that sample size. I suppose when I win the sunday 1m next week and my results go from +7000 over the last 400 tournaments or whatever, to +157,000, I'm all of a sudden a better player. [/ QUOTE ] I think that is the whole point of a draft--different captains will work in different ways and whoever has the best system will have the best chance of winning. Your argument is parallel to the one made by those who argue that the NFL's Wunderlich (sp?) Test shouldn't be used, because it doesn't indicate who will be a good football player. Well, sure it doesn't, but it attempts to measure intelligence, which is one of the many, many factors that goes into making a good football player, just like a 40-yard dash or a bench press measures other factors involved. There are going to be a lot of people in this contest, apparently. There are going to be a whole lot in the draft pool. There's no way any of the captains is going to be able to go back through the posts of every one of these guys to try to figure out who to pick. If your contention is correct that that's a better way to pick a team, then that will bear out in the competition (well, not really, due to MTT variance and all it'll still pretty much be a crapshoot, but you know what I mean). The point is all of the captains should function like sports general managers and work based on their own criteria and may the best criteria win. [/ QUOTE ] Good post, and I agree. It shouldn't be like openly printed for ppl, it's up to the captains to gain whatever information they might want. I am already thinking of who I will be picking over who, and who are my sleepers and who I expect to get snatched up quick. |
|
#146
|
|||
|
|||
|
-WPThero
-B... C once I win a damn tourney I play like everything though -I would be a captain, but since I am running it I will just get drafted instead -God... 200-400? ~Justin |
|
#147
|
|||
|
|||
|
-cappla011
-B and the occasional C's.... -N/A -60-100? |
|
#148
|
|||
|
|||
|
A)lawsoncb
B)A C)n/a D)50 |
|
#149
|
|||
|
|||
|
Since this is now the official thread
Skjonne B Nope, I'll just be Anskys round 1 pic 60 |
|
#150
|
|||
|
|||
|
1) GARDOCK
2) A 3) N/A 4) 50+ |
![]() |
|
|