![]() |
|
#141
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sauerbrun is the same guy that threatened the Gramaticas. He's f---ing GANGSTA.
|
|
#142
|
|||
|
|||
|
I must be the only one on this board who thinks that was a good call. I don't really care who wins.
|
|
#143
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well someone takes their sports too seriously, FYI about the Tuck Rule there needs to be indisputable visual evidence which means if 100 refs went in a room they would all overturn the call no way that is true for the tuck rule.
|
|
#144
|
|||
|
|||
|
Best time out ever
|
|
#145
|
|||
|
|||
|
hold den to a FG here and all is ok
|
|
#146
|
|||
|
|||
|
Just got some Pats in live betting at +304. Go Pats. Woooooo.
|
|
#147
|
|||
|
|||
|
wow.
looked like the Pats were going into the half up 3-0 at the worst. Now it could be 14-3 Denver. I don't think I've ever witnessed 4 consecutive absolutely huge, demoralizing plays (OK, the TD run wasn't that bad). |
|
#148
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
I must be the only one on this board who thinks that was a good call. I don't really care who wins. [/ QUOTE ] Make up call for the Indy game two years ago |
|
#149
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Well someone takes their sports too seriously, FYI about the Tuck Rule there needs to be indisputable visual evidence which means if 100 refs went in a room they would all overturn the call no way that is true for the tuck rule. [/ QUOTE ] the brady call was correct. and i don't take my sports as seriously as my hobby of pointing out morons. |
|
#150
|
|||
|
|||
|
I thought the "tuck rule" call was technically correct. It sucked, but it seems like the refs got it right.
That pass interference was crap though. And I'm cheering for Denver. |
![]() |
|
|