OMG Phil hellmuth is so bad at poker!

[sigurrostyp]

OMG i feel dumber after reading this

[ed8383]

[ QUOTE ]
Phils definately a good tournament I doubt with his old fashioned playstyle hes even top 100 in the world ATM in tourns.

[/ QUOTE ]
*cough wsop 2006, cough his record*
[ QUOTE ]
He never will be the best until he learns how to deal with bad beats, most people gain this skill within their first year of playing poker.

[/ QUOTE ]first year? ha!

[iMsoLucky0]

fwiw, I played quite a bit with Phil at the wsop (including several hours in the tourney he won his bracelet in down to 3 or 4 tables), and I was very impressed with his play. He was very hard to play against and he made some awesome reads. Weak-tight is not descriptive of his game at all.

[Hollywade]

[ QUOTE ]
Who do you think is better than Phil Hellmuth? Phil Ivey? Hoyt Corkins?


[/ QUOTE ]

It seems like there's no way you could have been serious when you posted this. Where does it say you need to be a great cash game player to be good at poker? I'm pretty sure he's done well enough in tournaments to "get by." By that logic, is someone who doesn't dominate tournaments a bad player? I guess Chip Reese is no good at poker because he's been playing since the 70s and only has about 3 WSOP bracelets.

I really don't feel like wasting any more time responding to this drivel. You are an idiot.

[Army Eye]

A cautionary tale, on how one can brutally own oneself on a forum. Thank you JooWish622.